Observational studyJournal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging2023
Gadolinium-based contrast agent exposures and physical and cognitive disability in multiple sclerosis.
Observational study in Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Noncontrast MRI Surveillance of Craniopharyngiomas Using a Balanced Steady-state Free Precession (bSSFP) Sequence.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2025Article
- Gadolinium-based contrast agent exposures and physical and cognitive disability in multiple sclerosis.Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging · 2023Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background and purposeThe clinical correlation of gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) has not been well studied in multiple sclerosis (MS). We investigated the extent to which the number of GBCA administrations relates to self-reported disability and performance measures.
methodsA cohort of MS patients was analyzed in this retrospective observational study. The main outcome was the association between the cumulative number of GBCA exposures (linear or macrocyclic GBCA), Patient-Determined Disease Steps (PDDS), and measures of physical and cognitive performance (walking speed test, manual dexterity test [MDT], and processing speed test [PST]). The analysis was performed first cross-sectionally and then longitudinally.
resultsThe cross-sectional data included 1059 MS patients with a mean age of 44.0 years (standard deviation = 11.2). While the contrast ratio in globus pallidus weakly correlated with PDDS, MDT, and PST in a univariate correlational analysis (coefficients, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.11 [0.04, 0.18], 0.15 [0.08, 0.21], and -0.16 [-0.10, -0.23], respectively), the associations disappeared after covariate adjustment. A significant association was found between number of linear GBCA administrations and PDDS (coefficient [CI] = -0.131 [-0.196, -0.067]), and MDT associated with macrocyclic GBCA administrations (-0.385 [-0.616, -0.154]), but their signs indicated better outcomes in patients with greater GBCA exposures. The longitudinal data showed no significant detrimental effect of macrocyclic GBCA exposures.
conclusionNo detrimental effects were observed between GBCA exposure and self-reported disability and standardized objective measures of physical and cognitive performance. While several weak associations were found, they indicated benefit on these measures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.