Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36181658›Full record

ArticleAmbio2022

Marine resources and their value in Kadavu, Fiji.

Simon Harding, Kalisiana Marama, Annette Breckwoldt, Ulamila Matairakula, Elodie Fache

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ambio, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Simon HardingInstitute of Marine Resources, The University of the South Pacific, Laucala Campus, Private Mailbag, Suva, Fiji. simonharding@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1393-9570
Kalisiana MaramaInstitute of Marine Resources, The University of the South Pacific, Laucala Campus, Private Mailbag, Suva, Fiji.
Annette BreckwoldtSocial-Ecological Systems Analysis, Social Science Department, Leibniz Centre for Tropical Marine Research (ZMT), Fahrenheitstrasse 6, 28359, Bremen, Germany.
Ulamila MatairakulaInstitute of Marine Resources, The University of the South Pacific, Laucala Campus, Private Mailbag, Suva, Fiji.
Elodie FacheUMR SENS, IRD, CIRAD, Univ Paul Valery Montpellier 3, Univ Montpellier, Site St Charles 2, Route de Mende, 34199, Montpellier Cedex 5, France.

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche ANR-17-FRAL-0001-01Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft grant number 389654580
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recognition of the multiple types of value of marine resources is crucial to help design locally meaningful and sustainable management approaches for marine and coastal habitats. There is a lack of information on the amount of living marine resources harvested by coastal communities in many Pacific Island Countries and Territories (PICTs), as well as on their economic and non-economic value. This paper explores the monetary, subsistence, and sociocultural value of selected marine resources (finfish and invertebrates) in Kadavu province, Fiji, based on a household survey and semi-structured interviews conducted in 2019 within one specific district. The paper provides estimates of the annual catch and monetary value of marine resources harvested by local communities at both the district and provincial levels, derived from catch and effort information collected from fishers and gleaners in situ. It also highlights the importance of integrating the sociocultural significance of marine resources into future value assessments.

Indexed as

EcosystemFisheriesAnimalsConservation of Natural ResourcesFijiFishesCoastal fisheriesEconomic and sociocultural valueFijiInterdisciplinaryMarine resourcesSouth-western Pacific

Identifiers

PMID36181658
PMCPMC9584011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.