ArticleAnimal cognition2023
Spontaneous object recognition in capuchin monkeys: assessing the effects of sex, familiarization phase and retention delay.
Article in Animal cognition, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
The spontaneous object recognition (SOR) task is a versatile and widely used memory test that was only recently established in nonhuman primates (marmosets). Here, we extended these initial findings by assessing the performance of adult capuchin monkeys on the SOR task and three potentially intervening task parameters-object familiarization phase, retention delay and sex. In Experiment 1, after an initial 10-min familiarization period with two identical objects and a pre-established retention delay (0.5, 6 or 24 h), the capuchins preferentially explored a new rather than the familiar object during a 10-min test trial, regardless of delay length. In Experiment 2, the capuchins were again exposed to two identical objects (but now for 10 or 20 min), then a 30-min retention delay and a 10-min test trial. An exploratory preference for the new over the familiar item was not affected by the length of the familiarization interval, possibly because overall exploration remained the same. However, the amount of initial object exploration was not related to task performance, and both males and females performed similarly on the SOR task with a 10-min familiarization, 30-min delay and 10-min test trial. Therefore, male and female capuchins recognize objects on the SOR task after both short and long delays, whereas a twofold increase in the familiarization phase does not affect task performance. The results also provide further support for the use of incidental learning paradigms to assess recognition memory in nonhuman primates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.