Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36181565›Full record

ReviewJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2023

Ten years of AMNOG from an oncological perspective: new horizons and continuing expansion.

Arne Bartol, Katrin Dressler, Peter Kaskel, Christiane Landsberg, Cornelia Lechner, Marco Petschulies

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Does health technology assessment compromise access to pharmaceuticals?The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Arne BartolHealth Policy and Market Access Working Group of Section C of the German Cancer Society, Berlin, Germany.
Katrin DresslerHealth Policy and Market Access Working Group of Section C of the German Cancer Society, Berlin, Germany.
Peter KaskelHealth Policy and Market Access Working Group of Section C of the German Cancer Society, Berlin, Germany.
Christiane LandsbergHealth Policy and Market Access Working Group of Section C of the German Cancer Society, Berlin, Germany.
Cornelia LechnerHealth Policy and Market Access Working Group of Section C of the German Cancer Society, Berlin, Germany. clechner@amgen.com.
Marco PetschuliesHealth Policy and Market Access Working Group of Section C of the German Cancer Society, Berlin, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose2021 marks the tenth anniversary of the AMNOG process and brought with it a new German administration-two good reasons to take stock of where we stand today, what has been achieved so far, and how the path of early benefit assessments in Germany should continue.

resultsFrom the perspective of manufacturers of cancer drugs, the AMNOG process, as a constantly evolving system, has for the most part proved itself-which does not mean that there is no longer room for improvement. Significant improvements have been achieved in the area of early consultation of medical societies regarding the selection of the appropriate comparator therapy as well as in the reimbursement of biomarker diagnostic tests in the outpatient sector. However, there is still a need for improvement, especially in the areas of patient-relevant outcomes accepted by the G-BA, the inclusion of real-world data in evidence assessments, or the transfer of evidence from certain patient groups to others.

conclusionThe current AMNOG structures were developed for the most part at a time when no one saw immuno-oncology or gene and cell therapies coming, when there were no multi-tumor drug approvals, and when few imagined that within a few years, the established tumor entities would be broken down into dozens of sub-entities on the basis of molecular genetic markers. Society wants these and other advances, and the HTA process must, therefore, take this into account in a healthcare system based on solidarity.

Indexed as

Drug ApprovalNeoplasmsDelivery of Health CareGermanyHumansTreatment OutcomeAMNOGDrugsGermanyHTAOncology

Identifiers

PMID36181565
PMCPMC9525922

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.