Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36181564›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2022

The effect of selective decontamination on the intestinal microbiota as measured with IS-pro: a taxonomic classification tool applicable for direct evaluation of intestinal microbiota in clinical routine.

M L M van Doorn-Schepens, G S A Abis, S J Oosterling, M van Egmond, L Poort, H B A C Stockmann, H J Bonjer, P H M Savelkoul, A E Budding

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The perioperative microbiome of patients undergoing rectal cancer surgery: A pilot study.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

M L M van Doorn-SchepensDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Infection Control, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1118, PK1X124, Amsterdam, 1081, HZ, the Netherlands. m.l.m.vandoornschepens@olvg.nl.
G S A AbisDepartment of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
S J OosterlingDepartment of Surgery, Spaarne Gasthuis Hospital, Haarlem/Hoofddorp, The Netherlands.
M van EgmondDepartment of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
L PoortIn Biome, Science Park, 116, Amsterdam, 1081, XG, The Netherlands.
H B A C StockmannDepartment of Surgery, Spaarne Gasthuis Hospital, Haarlem/Hoofddorp, The Netherlands.
H J BonjerDepartment of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
P H M SavelkoulDepartment of Medical Microbiology, NUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
A E BuddingIn Biome, Science Park, 116, Amsterdam, 1081, XG, The Netherlands.
Amsterdam University Medical Centers · NLSpaarne Gasthuis · NLMaastricht University · NLMeander Medisch Centrum · NLVrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Selective decontamination of the digestive tract (SDD) is aimed at elimination of potential pathogenic microorganisms. In this study, the effect of SDD on gut microbiota was evaluated in a large homogenous group of elective colorectal cancer surgery patients. Rectal swabs were taken from 118 patients undergoing colorectal surgery. These patients were randomly assigned to receive perioperative SDD or to the control group (no SDD). Rectal swabs were taken prior to surgery, 3 days after commencing administration of SDD. Gut microbial profiles were obtained with the IS-pro technique, a standardized microbiota profiling assay applicable in clinical routine. Differences in abundance for different taxonomical groups and diversity between the groups were assessed. Unsupervised and supervised classification techniques were used to assess microbial signatures, differentiating between the SDD group and the control group. Patients in the SDD group had different gut microbial signatures than in the control group, also in phyla that are not a target for SDD. Escherichia coli, Sutterella spp., Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, and Streptococcus spp. were the species that differed the most between the two groups. The SDD group showed clustering into two subgroups. In one subgroup, a decrease in Proteobacteria was observed, whereas the other subgroup showed a shift in Proteobacteria species. This study shows that SDD not only decreases colonization of the gastrointestinal tract with potential pathogenic Gram-negative microorganisms, but also reduces the abundance of normal colonizers of our gastrointestinal system and leads to a shift in total microbiota composition.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeAnti-Bacterial AgentsDecontaminationElective Surgical ProceduresGastrointestinal TractHumansIntensive Care UnitsAnti-Bacterial AgentsColorectal cancer surgeryIS-proMicrobiotaSDD

Identifiers

PMID36181564
PMCPMC9556388
OpenAlexW4298326432

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.