Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36181549›Full record

ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2023

Revision sacrocolpopexy: tips and tricks for optimal outcomes.

Ukpebo Omosigho, Marie Fidela R Paraiso, Olivia H Chang

Abstract readVideo-Audio Media
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International urogynecology journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The Surgical Challenge of the Repeat Sacrocolpopexy.International urogynecology journal · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ukpebo OmosighoObstetrics and Gynecology Resident, Cleveland Clinic Women's Health Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA. uomosigh@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-6649-390X
Marie Fidela R ParaisoObstetrics and Gynecology Resident, Cleveland Clinic Women's Health Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Olivia H ChangDivision of Urogynecology and Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Cleveland Clinic · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and hypothesisThe aim of this video is to highlight important considerations and techniques for revision sacrocolpopexy in women with symptomatic recurrence of pelvic organ prolapse after sacrocolpopexy.

methodsIn this video, we show five patients who presented with recurrent symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse after prior sacrocolpopexy. We demonstrate techniques for robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy revision including surgical dissection, revision of existing mesh, and/or addition of new mesh.

conclusionsOverall, revision sacrocolpopexy requires an individualized approach. These surgeries are often challenging because of adhesions and altered anatomy from the prior sacrocolpopexy. The reviewed considerations and techniques can be useful for ensuring a safe and effective outcome.

Indexed as

LaparoscopyPelvic Organ ProlapseFemaleGynecologic Surgical ProceduresHumansSacrumSurgical MeshTreatment OutcomeVaginaRecurrent pelvic organ prolapseRevision sacrocolpopexy

Identifiers

PMID36181549
OpenAlexW4298326642

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.