Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36181467›Full record

ReviewHealth policy and planning2023

Using health policy and systems research to influence national health policies: lessons from Mexico, Cambodia and Ghana.

Daniel Llywelyn Strachan, Kirsty Teague, Anteneh Asefa, Peter Leslie Annear, Abdul Ghaffar, Zubin Cyrus Shroff, Barbara McPake

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Health policy and planning, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Daniel Llywelyn StrachanThe Nossal Institute for Global Health, The University of Melbourne, 333 Exhibition Street, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6143-1742
Kirsty TeagueThe Nossal Institute for Global Health, The University of Melbourne, 333 Exhibition Street, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0450-4444
Anteneh AsefaThe Nossal Institute for Global Health, The University of Melbourne, 333 Exhibition Street, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia.
Peter Leslie AnnearThe Nossal Institute for Global Health, The University of Melbourne, 333 Exhibition Street, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7887-8292
Abdul GhaffarThe Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research, WHO, 20 Avenue Appia, Geneva 1211, Switzerland.
Zubin Cyrus ShroffThe Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research, WHO, 20 Avenue Appia, Geneva 1211, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-0582-8582
Barbara McPakeThe Nossal Institute for Global Health, The University of Melbourne, 333 Exhibition Street, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia.

Funding

Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Health system reforms across Africa, Asia and Latin America in recent decades demonstrate the value of health policy and systems research (HPSR) in moving towards the goals of universal health coverage in different circumstances and by various means. The role of evidence in policy making is widely accepted; less well understood is the influence of the concrete conditions under which HPSR is carried out within the national context and which often determine policy outcomes. We investigated the varied experiences of HPSR in Mexico, Cambodia and Ghana (each selected purposively as a strong example reflecting important lessons under varying conditions) to illustrate the ways in which HPSR is used to influence health policy. We reviewed the academic and grey literature and policy documents, constructed three country case studies and interviewed two leading experts from each of Mexico and Cambodia and three from Ghana (using semi-structured interviews, anonymized to ensure objectivity). For the design of the study, design of the semi-structured topic guide and the analysis of results, we used a modified version of the context-based analytical framework developed by Dobrow et al. (Evidence-based health policy: context and utilisation. Social Science & Medicine 2004;58:207-17). The results demonstrate that HPSR plays a varied but essential role in effective health policy making and that the use, implementation and outcomes of research and research-based evidence occurs inevitably within a national context that is characterized by political circumstances, the infrastructure and capacity for research and the longer-term experience with HPSR processes. This analysis of national experiences demonstrates that embedding HPSR in the policy process is both possible and productive under varying economic and political circumstances. Supporting research structures with social development legislation, establishing relationships based on trust between researchers and policy makers and building a strong domestic capacity for health systems research all demonstrate means by which the value of HPSR can be materialized in strengthening health systems.

Indexed as

Health PolicyHealth Services ResearchCambodiaGhanaHumansMexicoCambodiaGhanaHealth policy and systems researchMexico

Identifiers

PMID36181467
PMCPMC9849714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.