Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36181458›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism2022

Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors and the Risk of Pneumonia and Septic Shock.

Hang-Long Li, Yi-Kei Tse, Chanchal Chandramouli, Nicole Wing-Lam Hon, Ching-Lung Cheung, Lok-Yee Lam, Meizhen Wu, Jia-Yi Huang, Si-Yeung Yu, Ka-Lam Leung and 8 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Late Allograft Loss and Contemporary Cardiorenal Metabolic Therapies.Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN · 2025
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Hang-Long LiDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen 518053, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2294-2977
Yi-Kei TseDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen 518053, China.
Chanchal ChandramouliNational Heart Centre Singapore, Singapore 169609, Singapore.
Nicole Wing-Lam HonDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen 518053, China.
Ching-Lung CheungDepartment of Pharmacology and Pharmacy, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong 999077, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6233-9144
Lok-Yee LamDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen 518053, China.
Meizhen WuDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen 518053, China.
Jia-Yi HuangDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen 518053, China.
Si-Yeung YuDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen 518053, China.
Ka-Lam LeungDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen 518053, China.
Yue FeiDivision of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong 999077, China.
Qi FengJockey Club School of Public Health and Primary Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong 999077, China.
Qingwen RenDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen 518053, China.
Bernard M Y CheungDivision of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong 999077, China.
Hung-Fat TseDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen 518053, China.
Subodh VermaDivision of Cardiac Surgery, St Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5B 1W8, Canada.
Carolyn S P LamNational Heart Centre Singapore, Singapore 169609, Singapore.
Kai-Hang YiuDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen 518053, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2145-3108
Queen Mary Hospital · CNChinese University of Hong Kong · HKDuke-NUS Medical School · SGSt. Michael's Hospital · CAUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NLUniversity of Hong Kong · HK

Funding

Shenzhen Key Medical Discipline SZXK2020081the Sanming Project of HKU-SZH Cardiology SZSM201911020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextIndividuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) have an increased risk of pneumonia and septic shock. Traditional glucose-lowering drugs have recently been found to be associated with a higher risk of infections. It remains unclear whether sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is), which have pleiotropic/anti-inflammatory effects, may reduce the risk of pneumonia and septic shock in DM.

methodsMEDLINE, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched from inception up to May 19, 2022, for randomized, placebo-controlled trials of SGLT2i that included patients with DM and reported outcomes of interest (pneumonia and/or septic shock). Study selection, data extraction, and quality assessment (using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment Tool) were conducted by independent authors. A fixed-effects model was used to pool the relative risk (RRs) and 95% CI across trials.

resultsOut of 4568 citations, 26 trials with a total of 59 264 patients (1.9% developed pneumonia and 0.2% developed septic shock) were included. Compared with placebo, SGLT2is significantly reduced the risk of pneumonia (pooled RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.78-0.98) and septic shock (pooled RR 0.65, 95% CI 0.44-0.95). There was no significant heterogeneity of effect size among trials. Subgroup analyses according to the type of SGLT2i used, baseline comorbidities, glycemic control, duration of DM, and trial follow-up showed consistent results without evidence of significant treatment-by-subgroup heterogeneity (all Pheterogeneity > .10).

conclusionAmong DM patients, SGLT2is reduced the risk of pneumonia and septic shock compared with placebo. Our findings should be viewed as hypothesis generating, with concepts requiring validation in future studies.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2PneumoniaShock, SepticGlucoseHumansSodiumGlucoseSodiumdiabetespneumoniarespiratory tract infectionsseptic shock

Identifiers

PMID36181458
PMCPMC9693836
OpenAlexW4298327040

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.