Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36181319›Full record

ArticleBone & joint open2022

The Open-Fracture Patient Evaluation Nationwide (OPEN) study : epidemiology of open fracture care in the UK.

James N Hadfield, Tomisin S Omogbehin, Charlotte Brookes, Reece Walker, Alex Trompeter, Christopher P Bretherton, Andrew Gray, William G P Eardley, Open Fracture Patient Evaluation Nationwide (OPEN) collaborators

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bone & joint open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trends in Lower Limb Orthoplastic Surgery: A Bibliometric Analysis.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

James N HadfieldTrauma & Orthopaedics, James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7052-8036
Tomisin S OmogbehinTrauma & Orthopaedics, James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1754-8163
Charlotte BrookesTrauma & Orthopaedics, James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7765-8084
Reece WalkerTrauma & Orthopaedics, James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7181-4699
Alex TrompeterSt George's University Hospital, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7887-497X
Christopher P BrethertonTrauma & Orthopaedics, James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9569-0734
Andrew GraySouth Tees Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Middlesbrough, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2032-2798
William G P EardleySouth Tees Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Middlesbrough, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1980-8520
Open Fracture Patient Evaluation Nationwide (OPEN) collaborators
James Cook University Hospital · GBSouth Tees Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBSt George's Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsUnderstanding of open fracture management is skewed due to reliance on small-number lower limb, specialist unit reports and large, unfocused registry data collections. To address this, we carried out the Open Fracture Patient Evaluation Nationwide (OPEN) study, and report the demographic details and the initial steps of care for patients admitted with open fractures in the UK.

methodsAny patient admitted to hospital with an open fracture between 1 June 2021 and 30 September 2021 was included, excluding phalanges and isolated hand injuries. Institutional information governance approval was obtained at the lead site and all data entered using Research Electronic Data Capture. Demographic details, injury, fracture classification, and patient dispersal were detailed.

resultsIn total, 1,175 patients (median age 47 years (interquartile range (IQR) 29 to 65), 61.0% male (n = 717)) were admitted across 51 sites. A total of 546 patients (47.1%) were employed, 5.4% (n = 63) were diabetic, and 28.8% (n = 335) were smokers. In total, 29.0% of patients (n = 341) had more than one injury and 4.8% (n = 56) had two or more open fractures, while 51.3% of fractures (n = 637) occurred in the lower leg. Fractures sustained in vehicle incidents and collisions are common (38.8%; n = 455) and typically seen in younger patients. A simple fall (35.0%; n = 410) is common in older people. Overall, 69.8% (n = 786) of patients were admitted directly to an orthoplastic centre, 23.0% (n = 259) were transferred to an orthoplastic centre after initial management elsewhere, and 7.2% were managed outwith specialist units (n = 81).

conclusionThis study describes the epidemiology of open fractures in the UK. For a decade, orthopaedic surgeons have been practicing in a guideline-driven, network system without understanding the patient features, injury characteristics, or dispersal processes of the wider population. This work will inform care pathways as the UK looks to the future of trauma networks and guidelines, and how to optimize care for patients with open fractures.Cite this article:

Indexed as

Charlson Comorbidity IndexepidemiologyEpidemiologyFractureFrailtyhand injurieslower limbOpenopen fracturesorthopaedic surgeonsOrthopaedic TraumaphalangestibiaTrauma

Identifiers

PMID36181319
PMCPMC9626856
OpenAlexW4298326759

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.