Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36181016›Full record

ArticleMedicine2022

Advantages of an alternate-day glucocorticoid treatment strategy for the treatment of IgG4-related disease: A preliminary retrospective cohort study.

Sho Fukui, Takehiro Nakai, Satoshi Kawaai, Yukihiko Ikeda, Masei Suda, Atsushi Nomura, Hiromichi Tamaki, Mitsumasa Kishimoto, Sachiko Ohde, Masato Okada

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sho FukuiImmuno-Rheumatology Center, St. Luke's International Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-3082-1374
Takehiro NakaiImmuno-Rheumatology Center, St. Luke's International Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Satoshi KawaaiImmuno-Rheumatology Center, St. Luke's International Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Yukihiko IkedaImmuno-Rheumatology Center, St. Luke's International Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Masei SudaImmuno-Rheumatology Center, St. Luke's International Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Atsushi NomuraImmuno-Rheumatology Center, St. Luke's International Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Hiromichi TamakiImmuno-Rheumatology Center, St. Luke's International Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Mitsumasa KishimotoImmuno-Rheumatology Center, St. Luke's International Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Sachiko OhdeCenter for Clinical Epidemiology, St. Luke's International University, Tokyo, Japan.
Masato OkadaImmuno-Rheumatology Center, St. Luke's International Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
St. Luke's International Hospital · JPKyorin University · JPSt. Luke's International University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Alternate-day glucocorticoid (GC) therapy is a treatment option that can reduce GC-associated adverse events. We investigated the safety and efficacy of alternate-day GC therapy in patients with immunoglobulin G4-related disease (IgG4-RD). Medical records of patients with IgG4-RD who were followed for at least one year at St. Luke's International Hospital, Tokyo, Japan, from 2004 to 2020 were reviewed. Patients who fulfilled comprehensive IgG4-RD diagnostic criteria were divided into alternate-day or daily GC treatment groups based on their treatment protocol. The effect of alternate-day GC therapy on glucocorticoid toxicity index (GTI) score was evaluated using multilinear analysis with adjustments for cumulative GC doses until each assessment point and propensity scores (PS) for alternate-day GC therapy. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazard models were used to assess the efficacy of alternate-day GC therapy for disease control. Among the 67 patients with IgG4-RD, patients with alternate-day (n = 13) and daily (n = 31) GC treatments were analyzed after excluding 23 ineligible patients. The median (interquartile range) age was 64 (60-70) years, 29 (65.9%) were male patients, 26 (59.1%) patients had positive biopsy results, and the median follow-up period was 1643 days. Significantly more patients with alternate-day GC treatment used concomitant immunosuppressants (11 [84.6%] vs 11 [35.5%]; P = .007). The alternate-day strategy significantly lowered the GTI score after adjusting for cumulative GC dose until the assessment and PS (adjusted coefficient: -29.5 [-54.3, -4.8], P = .021 at 12 months; -20.0 [-39.8, -0.1], P = .049 at 24 months). Serious infections were numerically less frequent in the alternate-day group (incidence ratio [95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.45 [0.05, 3.63], P = .45). Most patients (92.3%) in the alternate-day GC treatment group and all patients in the daily GC treatment group showed treatment responses in the remission induction therapy. The PS-adjusted hazard ratio of alternate-day GC treatment for disease flares was not significant (1.55 [0.53, 4.51]; P = .43). The alternate-day treatment strategy significantly reduced GC-related adverse events regardless of the cumulative GC dose. Alternate-day GC treatment is a feasible option for patients with IgG4-RD, without a significant increase in disease flares particularly when combined with immunosuppressants.

Indexed as

Immunoglobulin G4-Related DiseaseAgedFemaleGlucocorticoidsHumansImmunoglobulin GImmunosuppressive AgentsMaleMiddle AgedRemission InductionRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeGlucocorticoidsImmunoglobulin GImmunosuppressive Agents

Identifiers

PMID36181016
PMCPMC9524883
OpenAlexW4298125882

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.