Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36180948›Full record

ArticleJournal of pharmaceutical health care and sciences2022

Association between time in therapeutic range of tacrolimus blood concentration and acute rejection within the first three months after lung transplantation.

Yoshiki Katada, Shunsaku Nakagawa, Kotaro Itohara, Takuya Suzuki, Ryota Kato, Hiroki Endo, Mitsuhiro Sugimoto, Atsushi Yonezawa, Takayuki Nakagawa, Akihiro Ohsumi and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pharmaceutical health care and sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Post-lung transplant surveillance in 2026: current practice, variability, and the need for standardization.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yoshiki KatadaDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Kyoto University Hospital, 54 Kawahara-cho, Shogoin, Kyoto, Sakyo-ku, 606-8507, Japan.
Shunsaku NakagawaDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Kyoto University Hospital, 54 Kawahara-cho, Shogoin, Kyoto, Sakyo-ku, 606-8507, Japan.
Kotaro ItoharaDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Kyoto University Hospital, 54 Kawahara-cho, Shogoin, Kyoto, Sakyo-ku, 606-8507, Japan.
Takuya SuzukiDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Kyoto University Hospital, 54 Kawahara-cho, Shogoin, Kyoto, Sakyo-ku, 606-8507, Japan.
Ryota KatoDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Kyoto University Hospital, 54 Kawahara-cho, Shogoin, Kyoto, Sakyo-ku, 606-8507, Japan.
Hiroki EndoDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Kyoto University Hospital, 54 Kawahara-cho, Shogoin, Kyoto, Sakyo-ku, 606-8507, Japan.
Mitsuhiro SugimotoDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Kyoto University Hospital, 54 Kawahara-cho, Shogoin, Kyoto, Sakyo-ku, 606-8507, Japan.
Atsushi YonezawaDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Kyoto University Hospital, 54 Kawahara-cho, Shogoin, Kyoto, Sakyo-ku, 606-8507, Japan.
Takayuki NakagawaDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Kyoto University Hospital, 54 Kawahara-cho, Shogoin, Kyoto, Sakyo-ku, 606-8507, Japan.
Akihiro OhsumiDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, 54 Kawahara-cho, Shogoin, Kyoto, Sakyo-ku, 606-8507, Japan.
Daisuke NakajimaDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, 54 Kawahara-cho, Shogoin, Kyoto, Sakyo-ku, 606-8507, Japan.
Hiroshi DateDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, 54 Kawahara-cho, Shogoin, Kyoto, Sakyo-ku, 606-8507, Japan.
Tomohiro TeradaDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Kyoto University Hospital, 54 Kawahara-cho, Shogoin, Kyoto, Sakyo-ku, 606-8507, Japan. teradat@kuhp.kyoto-u.ac.jp.
Kyoto University Hospital · JPKyoto University · JP

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science Grant-in-Aid for Encouragement of Scientists [22H04309]
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTacrolimus is a key drug in immunosuppressive therapy following lung transplantation. The blood tacrolimus levels are likely to fluctuate in the early postoperative period, and failure to maintain the tacrolimus trough level in target ranges is a risk factor for rejection. However, there is little information about the relationship between the time in therapeutic range (TTR) of the tacrolimus trough level (tacrolimus TTR) and clinical outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate the association between tacrolimus TTR and acute rejection (AR) within the first three months after lung transplantation.

methodsThis was a retrospective study of patients who underwent lung transplantation at a single center. The target tacrolimus trough levels were 10-15 ng/mL, and tacrolimus TTR was calculated using the Rosendaal method. The cut-off value of the tacrolimus TTR was estimated by receiver operating characteristic analysis based on AR.

resultsThe study included 90 patients. AR was observed in 26 patients. In this study, ''early-AR'' was defined as any AR within 2 weeks post-transplant (n = 22) and ''late-AR'' was defined as any AR after 1-month post-transplant (n = 4). For early AR, the relationship between tacrolimus TTR and the onset of AR was examined. There were no differences in the tacrolimus TTR between the early-AR group and non-AR group (35.7 ± 22.4 vs 31.5 ± 19.9%, P = 0.416). For late-AR, the relationship with tacrolimus TTR was examined every 10 d. The tacrolimus TTR during postoperative days (POD) 21-30 and POD 31-onset was significantly lower in the late-AR group than the no-AR group (50.0 ± 7.1 vs. 71.8 ± 18.0% and 37.0 ± 26.6 vs. 68.9 ± 31.5%, P < 0.05, respectively). The cutoff value of the tacrolimus TTR during POD 21-30 was estimated as 55.0%.

conclusionsOur findings suggest that a lower tacrolimus TTR is a predictor of late AR. A tacrolimus TTR of 55% or higher is necessary to reduce the risk of AR during this period after lung transplantation.

Indexed as

Acute rejectionLung transplantationTacrolimusTherapeutic drug monitoringTime in therapeutic range

Identifiers

PMID36180948
PMCPMC9526258
OpenAlexW4298120560

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.