Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36180931›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental microbiome2022

Microbiome ethics, guiding principles for microbiome research, use and knowledge management.

Lene Lange, Gabriele Berg, Tomislav Cernava, Marie-Christine Champomier-Vergès, Trevor Charles, Luca Cocolin, Paul Cotter, Kathleen D'Hondt, Tanja Kostic, Emmanuelle Maguin and 10 more

Open access · goldAbstract readLetter
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental microbiome, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 16 institutions in 14 countries.

Lene LangeLL-BioEconomy, Valby, Copenhagen, Denmark. lene.lange2@gmail.com.
Gabriele BergGraz University of Technology, Graz, Austria.
Tomislav CernavaGraz University of Technology, Graz, Austria.
Marie-Christine Champomier-VergèsINRAE, AgroParisTech, Micalis Institute, Université Paris-Saclay, Jouy-en-Josas, France.
Trevor CharlesUniversity of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada.
Luca CocolinUniversity of Turin, Grugliasco, Italy.
Paul CotterTeagasc Food Research Centre, Moorepark, APC Microbiome Ireland and VistaMilk, Cork, Ireland.
Kathleen D'HondtDepartment of Economy, Science and Innovation, Flemish Government, Brussels, Belgium.
Tanja KosticAIT Austrian Institute of Technology GmbH, Tulln, Austria.
Emmanuelle MaguinINRAE, AgroParisTech, Micalis Institute, Université Paris-Saclay, Jouy-en-Josas, France.
Thulani MakhalanyaneUniversity of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.
Annelein MeisnerWageningen Research, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Matthew RyanGenetic Resources Collection, CABI, Egham, UK.
George Seghal KiranPondicherry University, Puducherry, India.
Rafael Soares de SouzaState University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.
Yolanda SanzInstitute of Agrochemistry and Food Technology- Spanish National Research Council (IATA-CSIC), Valencia, Spain.
Michael SchloterHelmholtz Zentrum München, Oberschleissheim, Germany.
Hauke SmidtLaboratory of Microbiology, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Steve WakelinScion, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Angela SessitschAIT Austrian Institute of Technology GmbH, Tulln, Austria. Angela.Sessitsch@ait.ac.at.
Austrian Institute of Technology · ATGraz University of Technology · ATWageningen University & Research · NLCAB International · GBConsejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas · ESFlemish Government · BEInstitute of Bioinformatics and Systems Biology · DEInstitut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement · FRMicrobiologie de l’alimentation au service de la santé · FRPondicherry University · INScion · NZTeagasc - The Irish Agriculture and Food Development Authority · IEUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) · BRUniversity of Pretoria · ZAUniversity of Turin · ITUniversity of Waterloo · CA

Funding

H2020 Societal Challenges 818116
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The overarching biological impact of microbiomes on their hosts, and more generally their environment, reflects the co-evolution of a mutualistic symbiosis, generating fitness for both. Knowledge of microbiomes, their systemic role, interactions, and impact grows exponentially. When a research field of importance for planetary health evolves so rapidly, it is essential to consider it from an ethical holistic perspective. However, to date, the topic of microbiome ethics has received relatively little attention considering its importance. Here, ethical analysis of microbiome research, innovation, use, and potential impact is structured around the four cornerstone principles of ethics: Do Good; Don't Harm; Respect; Act Justly. This simple, but not simplistic approach allows ethical issues to be communicative and operational. The essence of the paper is captured in a set of eleven microbiome ethics recommendations, e.g., proposing gut microbiome status as common global heritage, similar to the internationally agreed status of major food crops.

Indexed as

EthicsFAIR principlesFAO International TreatyGlobal common heritageMicrobiomePlanetary health

Identifiers

PMID36180931
PMCPMC9526347
OpenAlexW4298138575

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.