Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36180884›Full record

ArticleBMC complementary medicine and therapies2022

Prevalence, determinants and outcomes of traditional, complementary and alternative medicine use for hypertension among low-income households in Malaysia and the Philippines.

Lia M Palileo-Villanueva, Benjamin Palafox, Arianna Maever L Amit, Veincent Christian F Pepito, Fadhlina Ab-Majid, Farnaza Ariffin, Dina Balabanova, Mohamad-Rodi Isa, Nafiza Mat-Nasir, Mazapuspavina My and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC complementary medicine and therapies, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Lia M Palileo-Villanueva *College of Medicine, University of the Philippines Manila, Manila, Philippines.
Benjamin Palafox *Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Centre for Global Chronic Conditions, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London, WC1H 9SH, UK. benjamin.palafox@lshtm.ac.uk.
Arianna Maever L AmitCollege of Medicine, University of the Philippines Manila, Manila, Philippines.
Veincent Christian F PepitoCollege of Medicine, University of the Philippines Manila, Manila, Philippines.
Fadhlina Ab-MajidFaculty of Medicine, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Sungai Buloh, Malaysia.
Farnaza AriffinFaculty of Medicine, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Sungai Buloh, Malaysia.
Dina BalabanovaFaculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Centre for Global Chronic Conditions, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London, WC1H 9SH, UK.
Mohamad-Rodi IsaFaculty of Medicine, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Sungai Buloh, Malaysia.
Nafiza Mat-NasirFaculty of Medicine, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Sungai Buloh, Malaysia.
Mazapuspavina MyFaculty of Medicine, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Sungai Buloh, Malaysia.
Alicia RenedoFaculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Centre for Global Chronic Conditions, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London, WC1H 9SH, UK.
Maureen L SeguinFaculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Centre for Global Chronic Conditions, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London, WC1H 9SH, UK.
Khalid YusoffFaculty of Medicine, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Sungai Buloh, Malaysia.
Antonio L DansCollege of Medicine, University of the Philippines Manila, Manila, Philippines.
Martin MckeeFaculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Centre for Global Chronic Conditions, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London, WC1H 9SH, UK.
Universiti Teknologi MARA · MYLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBUniversity of the Philippines Manila · PHFaculty of Public Health · GBAteneo de Manila University · PHUCSI University · MY

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_PC_16026Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust/Newton Fund-MRC Humanities & Social Science Collaborative Award 200346/Z/15/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTraditional, complementary and alternative medicine (TCAM) is used to treat a broad range of conditions. In low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), TCAM use is particularly common among those with low socio-economic status. To better understand the patterns and impact of TCAM use on the management of non-communicable diseases in these populations, this study examines the prevalence and characteristics of TCAM use for hypertension, its determinants, and its association with hypertension management outcomes and wellbeing among low-income adults in two Southeast Asian countries at different levels of economic and health system development, Malaysia and the Philippines.

methodsWe analysed cross-sectional data from 946 randomly selected adults diagnosed with hypertension from low-income rural and urban communities in Malaysia (n = 495) and the Philippines (n = 451). We compared the prevalence, characteristics and household expenditure on TCAM use between countries and used multi-level, mixed-effects regression to estimate associations between TCAM use and its determinants, and five hypertension management outcomes and wellbeing.

resultsThe prevalence of TCAM use to manage hypertension was higher in the Philippines than in Malaysia (18.8% vs 8.8%, p < 0.001). Biologically-based modalities, e.g. herbal remedies, were the most common type of TCAM used in both countries, mainly as a complement, rather than an alternative to conventional treatment. Households allocated around 10% of health spending to TCAM in both countries. Belief that TCAM is effective for hypertension was a positive predictor of TCAM use, while belief in conventional medicine was a negative predictor. TCAM use was not strongly associated with current use of medications for hypertension, self-reported medication adherence, blood pressure level and control, or wellbeing in either country.

conclusionsA small, but significant, proportion of individuals living in low-income communities in Malaysia and the Philippines use TCAM to manage their hypertension, despite a general lack of evidence on efficacy and safety of commonly used TCAM modalities. Recognising that their patients may be using TCAM to manage hypertension will enable health care providers to deliver safer, more patient-centred care.

Indexed as

Complementary TherapiesHypertensionAdultCross-Sectional StudiesHumansMalaysiaPhilippinesPrevalenceBlood pressureHypertensionNon-communicable disease control, MalaysiaPhilippinesTraditional, complementary and alternative medicine

Identifiers

PMID36180884
PMCPMC9526286
OpenAlexW4298139041

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.