Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36180881›Full record

ArticleSystematic reviews2022

What is the most appropriate method for the measurement of the range of motion in the lumbar spine and how does surgical fixation affect the range of movement of the lumbar spine in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis? A systematic review protocol.

Laura Hartley, Mattia Zappalà, Uzo Ehiogu, Nicola R Heneghan, Adrian Gardner

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Systematic reviews, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Laura HartleyThe Royal Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, The Woodlands, Bristol Road South, Northfield, Birmingham, B31 2AP, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2450-6319
Mattia ZappalàSchool of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Uzo EhioguThe Royal Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, The Woodlands, Bristol Road South, Northfield, Birmingham, B31 2AP, UK.
Nicola R HeneghanSchool of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Adrian GardnerThe Royal Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, The Woodlands, Bristol Road South, Northfield, Birmingham, B31 2AP, UK. adrian.gardner@nhs.net.
Royal Orthopaedic Hospital · GBUniversity of Birmingham · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAdolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is a three-dimensional rotational change in the normal shape of the spine which affects children aged 10 to 18 years. Both the condition and its management can have significant impact on functional ability. Currently, expected restriction in spinal motion is experience based, rather than evidence based, and discussions to inform patient expectations pre-operatively can be difficult. The aim of this review is to evaluate the evidence pertaining to measurement of spinal motion and whether this is altered following surgery, dependent on the anatomical level of surgical fixation in AIS.  METHODS/ANALYSIS: This protocol is reported in line with both PRISMA-P and informed by the COSMIN methodology. Electronic databases will be searched using a two-stage search strategy. The first stage will identify and evaluate the methods used to assess spinal motion. The second stage aims to evaluate the change in spinal motion using these methods based on anatomical level of fixation following surgery along with the measurement properties of those methods, to include the validity, reliability and responsiveness of the methods. Two reviewers will independently screen the search results against eligibility criteria, extract the data and assess the quality of the included studies. Any disputes between the reviewers will be resolved with a third independent reviewer. Data may be pooled where possible; however, this is not expected. The overall strength of the body of evidence will then be assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. PATIENT AND PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT: Patients and members of the public will not be consulted in the production of this review, although the review was conceived based on the experiences of the authors when managing this patient population and a need to address patient expectations in pre-operative planning. ETHICS, DISSEMINATION AND DATA AVAILABILITY: No ethical approval required. The final review will be submitted to peer-reviewed journals for publication and disseminated publicly. The datasets used and/or analysed in this review will be available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.  SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO registration number. CRD42021282264.

Indexed as

ScoliosisSpinal FusionAdolescentChildHumansLumbar VertebraeMeta-Analysis as TopicRange of Motion, ArticularReproducibility of ResultsReview Literature as TopicSystematic Reviews as TopicAdolescent idiopathic scoliosisFixationFunctionFusionInstrumentationLumbar motionRange of motionScoliosisSpinal motionSurgerySurgical intervention

Identifiers

PMID36180881
PMCPMC9523991
OpenAlexW4298144873

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.