Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36180822›Full record

SynthesisBMC anesthesiology2022

Non-invasive ventilation for preoxygenation before general anesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Tsai-Lien Chiang, Ka-Wai Tam, Jui-Tai Chen, Chung-Shun Wong, Chun-Ting Yeh, Ting-Yun Huang, Jiann-Ruey Ong

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC anesthesiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tsai-Lien ChiangDivision of Emergency Medicine, Department of Emergency and Critical Care, Taipei Medical University-Shuang Ho Hospital, 291, Zhongzheng Road, Zhonghe District, New Taipei City, 23561, Taiwan.
Ka-Wai TamCenter for Evidence-Based Health Care, Taipei Medical University-Shuang Ho Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan.
Jui-Tai ChenDepartment of Anesthesiology, Taipei Medical University-Shuang Ho Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan.
Chung-Shun WongDivision of Emergency Medicine, Department of Emergency and Critical Care, Taipei Medical University-Shuang Ho Hospital, 291, Zhongzheng Road, Zhonghe District, New Taipei City, 23561, Taiwan.
Chun-Ting YehDivision of Emergency Medicine, Department of Emergency and Critical Care, Taipei Medical University-Shuang Ho Hospital, 291, Zhongzheng Road, Zhonghe District, New Taipei City, 23561, Taiwan.
Ting-Yun HuangDivision of Emergency Medicine, Department of Emergency and Critical Care, Taipei Medical University-Shuang Ho Hospital, 291, Zhongzheng Road, Zhonghe District, New Taipei City, 23561, Taiwan.
Jiann-Ruey OngDivision of Emergency Medicine, Department of Emergency and Critical Care, Taipei Medical University-Shuang Ho Hospital, 291, Zhongzheng Road, Zhonghe District, New Taipei City, 23561, Taiwan. 12642@s.tmu.edu.tw.
Taipei Medical University-Shuang Ho Hospital · TWTaipei Medical University · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesPreoxygenation is crucial for providing sufficient oxygen reservoir to a patient before intubation and enables the extension of the period between breathing termination and critical desaturation (safe apnoea time). Conventionally, face mask ventilation is used for preoxygenation. Non-invasive ventilation is a new preoxygenation method. The study objective was to compare the outcomes of non-invasive ventilation and face mask ventilation for preoxygenation.

methodPubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and the ClinicalTrials.gov registry were searched for eligible studies published from database inception to September 2021. Individual effect sizes were standardized, and a meta-analysis was conducted using random effects models to calculate the pooled effect size. Inclusion criteria were randomised controlled trials of comparing the outcomes of non-invasive ventilation or face mask ventilation for preoxygenation in patients scheduled for surgeries. The primary outcome was safe apnea time, and the secondary outcomes were post-operative complications, number of patients who achieved the expired O

results13 trials were eligible for inclusion in this study. Significant differences were observed in safe apnoea time, number of patients who achieved FeO

conclusionNon-invasive ventilation appeared to be more effective than conventional methods for preoxygenation. We recommend non-invasive ventilation based on our results.

Indexed as

Noninvasive VentilationAnesthesia, GeneralApneaCarbon DioxideHumansIntubation, IntratrachealOxygenRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicCarbon DioxideOxygenApneaDesaturationMeta-analysisNon-invasive positive pressure ventilationPreoxygenationVentilation

Identifiers

PMID36180822
PMCPMC9524013
OpenAlexW4298110280

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.