Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36180810›Full record

SynthesisJournal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine2022

The Differences by Sex and Gender in the Relationship Between Urban Greenness and Cardiometabolic Health: A Systematic Review.

Marta-Beatriz Fernández Núñez, Lia Campos Suzman, Roser Maneja, Albert Bach, Oriol Marquet, Isabelle Anguelovski, Pablo Knobel

Open access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Marta-Beatriz Fernández NúñezEnvironmental Science and Technology Institute (ICTA), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Lia Campos SuzmanEnvironmental Science and Technology Institute (ICTA), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Roser ManejaForest Science and Technology Center of Catalonia, Ctra. de St. Llorenç de Morunys, km 2, 25280, Solsona, Spain.
Albert BachForest Science and Technology Center of Catalonia, Ctra. de St. Llorenç de Morunys, km 2, 25280, Solsona, Spain.
Oriol MarquetGeography Department, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Isabelle AnguelovskiEnvironmental Science and Technology Institute (ICTA), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Pablo KnobelIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Department of Environmental Medicine and Public Health, 1 Gustave L. Levy Place, Box 1057, New York, NY, 10029, USA. pablo.knobel@mssm.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-6902-0286
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ESForest Science and Technology Centre of Catalonia · ESIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USInstitució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In an increasingly urbanized world, where cardiometabolic issues in cities have raised public health concerns, urban greenness is known to be beneficial for some of the most common health issues. However, the examination of the contribution of sex and gender regarding the benefits of urban greenness for people's cardiometabolic health is lacking. For that reason, we conducted a systematic review of previous literature on the topic following the PRISMA methodology. Additionally, we assessed the quality of the included articles, which we found satisfactory as most papers were of very good or good quality. We explored the relationship between urban greenness exposure and cardiovascular risk factors, cardiovascular diseases, and mortality from cardiovascular diseases. Results suggest that urban greenness is protective against cardiovascular risk factors, diseases, and mortality. When stratifying results by sex and gender, findings point to urban greenness being more beneficial for women and females in stroke and cardiovascular risk factors, except for hypertension and lipid accumulation product. On the other hand, males were more protected by urban greenness in terms of cardiovascular diseases and CVD-related mortality, thus proving that sex and gender health inequalities exist. Furthermore, looking towards the future, research needs to use the proper terminology for sex and gender and policy makers should design urban greenness with a gender perspective.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesCitiesFemaleHumansCardiovascular risk factorsGender differencesObesitySex differencesUrban greenness

Identifiers

PMID36180810
PMCPMC9727044
OpenAlexW4298148042

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.