Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36180790›Full record

ArticleNature neuroscience2022

A tool for mapping microglial morphology, morphOMICs, reveals brain-region and sex-dependent phenotypes.

Gloria Colombo, Ryan John A Cubero, Lida Kanari, Alessandro Venturino, Rouven Schulz, Martina Scolamiero, Jens Agerberg, Hansruedi Mathys, Li-Huei Tsai, Wojciech Chachólski and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed
8.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 90 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Topology across scales on heterogeneous cell data.PLoS computational biology · 2025
    Article
  15. Lewy body dementia promotion by air pollutants.Science (New York, N.Y.) · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Gloria Colombo *Institute of Science and Technology Austria (ISTA), Klosterneuburg, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9434-8902
Ryan John A Cubero *Institute of Science and Technology Austria (ISTA), Klosterneuburg, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0002-1867
Lida KanariBlue Brain Project, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9539-5070
Alessandro VenturinoInstitute of Science and Technology Austria (ISTA), Klosterneuburg, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2356-9403
Rouven SchulzInstitute of Science and Technology Austria (ISTA), Klosterneuburg, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5297-733X
Martina ScolamieroDepartment of Mathematics, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.
Jens AgerbergDepartment of Mathematics, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.
Hansruedi MathysPicower Institute for Learning and Memory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Li-Huei TsaiPicower Institute for Learning and Memory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1262-0592
Wojciech ChachólskiDepartment of Mathematics, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.
Kathryn HessLaboratory for Topology and Neuroscience, Brain Mind Institute, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland.
Sandra SiegertInstitute of Science and Technology Austria (ISTA), Klosterneuburg, Austria. ssiegert@ist.ac.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8635-0877
Institute of Science and Technology Austria · ATKTH Royal Institute of Technology · SEBroad Institute · USÉcole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne · CH

Funding

The Cdk5/35 KinaseR37NS051874 · NINDS · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI TSAI, LI-HUEI · 2016 to 2022
$3.2M
European Research Council 715571NINDS NIH HHS R37 NS051874
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Environmental cues influence the highly dynamic morphology of microglia. Strategies to characterize these changes usually involve user-selected morphometric features, which preclude the identification of a spectrum of context-dependent morphological phenotypes. Here we develop MorphOMICs, a topological data analysis approach, which enables semiautomatic mapping of microglial morphology into an atlas of cue-dependent phenotypes and overcomes feature-selection biases and biological variability. We extract spatially heterogeneous and sexually dimorphic morphological phenotypes for seven adult mouse brain regions. This sex-specific phenotype declines with maturation but increases over the disease trajectories in two neurodegeneration mouse models, with females showing a faster morphological shift in affected brain regions. Remarkably, microglia morphologies reflect an adaptation upon repeated exposure to ketamine anesthesia and do not recover to control morphologies. Finally, we demonstrate that both long primary processes and short terminal processes provide distinct insights to morphological phenotypes. MorphOMICs opens a new perspective to characterize microglial morphology.

Indexed as

KetamineMicrogliaAnimalsBrainDisease Models, AnimalFemaleMaleMicePhenotypeKetamine

Identifiers

PMID36180790
PMCPMC9534764
OpenAlexW4298137907

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.