ArticleScientific reports2022
Comparing two machine learning approaches in predicting lupus hospitalization using longitudinal data.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Machine learning in lupus nephritis: bridging prediction models and clinical decision-making towards personalized nephrology.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
- Systemic lupus in the era of machine learning medicine.Lupus science & medicine · 2024Review
- Studying Pregnancy Outcome Risk in Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Based on Cluster Analysis.BioMed research international · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a heterogeneous autoimmune disease characterized by flares ranging from mild to life-threatening. Severe flares and complications can require hospitalizations, which account for most of the direct costs of SLE care. This study investigates two machine learning approaches in predicting SLE hospitalizations using longitudinal data from 925 patients enrolled in a multicenter electronic health record (EHR)-based lupus cohort. Our first Differential approach accounts for the time dependencies in sequential data by introducing additional lagged variables between consecutive time steps. We next evaluate the performance of LSTM, a state-of-the-art deep learning model designed for time series. Our experimental results demonstrate that both methods can effectively predict lupus hospitalizations, but each has its strengths and limitations. Specifically, the Differential approach can be integrated into any non-temporal machine learning algorithms and is preferred for tasks with short observation periods. On the contrary, the LSTM model is desirable for studies utilizing long observation intervals attributing to its capability in capturing long-term dependencies embedded in the longitudinal data. Furthermore, the Differential approach has more options in handling class imbalance in the underlying data and delivers stable performance across different prognostic horizons. LSTM, on the other hand, demands more class-balanced training data and outperforms the Differential approach when there are sufficient positive samples facilitating model training. Capitalizing on our experimental results, we further study the optimal length of patient monitoring periods for different prediction horizons.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.