ArticleScientific reports2022
Novel approaches to the study of viscosity discrimination in rodents.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Texture has enormous effects on food preferences. The materials used to study texture discrimination also have tastes that experimental animal can detect; therefore, such studies must be designed to exclude taste differences. In this study, to minimize the effects of material tastes, we utilized high- and low-viscosity forms of carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC-H and CMC-L, respectively) at the same concentrations (0.1-3%) for viscosity discrimination tests in rats. In two-bottle preference tests of water and CMC, rats avoided CMC-H solutions above 1% (63 mPa·s) but did not avoid less viscous CMC-L solutions with equivalent taste magnitudes, suggesting that rats spontaneously avoided high viscosity. To evaluate low-viscosity discrimination, we performed conditioned aversion tests to 0.1% CMC, which initially showed a comparable preference ratio to water in the two-bottle preference tests. Conditioning with 0.1% CMC-L (1.5 mPa·s) did not induce aversion to 0.1% CMC-L or CMC-H. However, rats acquired a conditioned aversion to 0.1% CMC-H (3.6 mPa·s) even after latent inhibition to CMC taste by pre-exposure to 0.1% CMC-L. These results suggest that rats can discriminate considerably low viscosity independent of CMC taste. This novel approach for viscosity discrimination can be used to investigate the mechanisms of texture perception in mammals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.