ArticleScientific reports2022
Intrathecal B cell-related markers for an optimized biological investigation of multiple sclerosis patients.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Tertiary lymphoid structures in neuroinflammation coordinate neuroimmune homeostasis and pathological progression.Journal of neuroinflammation · 2026Review
- Real-world effectiveness and safety of ofatumumab in multiple sclerosis: a longitudinal study integrating clinical, cognitive, and MRI outcomes.Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders · 2026Article
- Kappa free light chain index as a diagnostic and prognostic biomarker in multiple sclerosis.Journal of neurology · 2025Article
- Fluid Biomarkers in Demyelinating Spectrum Disorders: Past, Present, and Prospects.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Biomarkers of Intrathecal Synthesis May Be Associated with Cognitive Impairment at MS Diagnosis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Intrathecal IgG and IgM synthesis correlates with neurodegeneration markers and corresponds to meningeal B cell presence in MS.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Fluid biomarkers in multiple sclerosis: from current to future applications.The Lancet regional health. Europe · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In multiple sclerosis (MS) disease, the importance of the intrathecal B cell response classically revealed as IgG oligoclonal bands (OCB) in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) was reaffirmed again in the recently revised diagnostic criteria. We aimed to optimize Laboratory investigation by testing the performance of new B cell-related molecules in CSF (Ig free light chains (FLCκ and λ) and CXCL13 (B-Cell Attracting chemokine1)) for MS diagnosis. 320 paired (CSF-serum) samples were collected from 160 patients with MS (n = 82) and non-MS diseases (n = 78). All patients benefited from IgG index determination, OCB detection, CSF CXCL13 and FLC (κ and λ) measurement in CSF and serum for metrics calculation (κ/λ ratio, FLC-related indexes, and κFLC-intrathecal fraction (IF)). CXCL13 and FLC metrics in CSF were higher in patients with MS and positive OCB. As expected, κFLC metrics-in particular, κFLC index and κFLC IF-had the highest accuracy for MS diagnosis. κ index showed the best performance (sensitivity 83% and specificity 91.7%) at a cut-off of 14.9. Most of the FLC-related parameters were positively correlated with IgG index and the level of CXCL13. In conclusion, the quantitative, standardizable, and technically simple CSF FLCκ metrics seem to be reliable for MS diagnosis, but could not replace OCB detection. CXCL13 appears to be an effective parameter reflecting the intrathecal B cell response. An optimized way for CSF testing combining the conventional and the new B cell-related parameters is proposed in this study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.