Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36180480›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Carcass detection and consumption by facultative scavengers in forest ecosystem highlights the value of their ecosystem services.

Akino Inagaki, Maximilian L Allen, Tetsuya Maruyama, Koji Yamazaki, Kahoko Tochigi, Tomoko Naganuma, Shinsuke Koike

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Akino InagakiUnited Graduate School of Agricultural Science, Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, 3-5-8 Saiwai-Cho, Fuchu, Tokyo, 183-8509, Japan. akino.inagaki@gmail.com.
Maximilian L AllenIllinois Natural History Survey, University of Illinois, Champaign, USA.
Tetsuya MaruyamaNature Preservation Division, Tochigi Prefecture, Utsunomiya, Tochigi, Japan.
Koji YamazakiDepartment of Forest Science, Tokyo University of Agriculture, Setagaya, Tokyo, Japan.
Kahoko TochigiUnited Graduate School of Agricultural Science, Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, 3-5-8 Saiwai-Cho, Fuchu, Tokyo, 183-8509, Japan.
Tomoko NaganumaNational Agriculture and Food Research Organization, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.
Shinsuke KoikeInstitute of Global Innovation Research, Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, Fuchu, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Scavenging is a common feeding behavior that provides ecosystem services by removing potentially infectious waste from the landscape. The importance of facultative scavenging is often overlooked, but likely becomes especially important in ecosystems without obligate scavengers. Here, we investigated the ecological function of vertebrate facultative scavengers in removing ungulate carcasses from Japanese forests that lack obligate scavengers. We found that mammals detected carcasses first more often than birds, and that raccoon dogs (Nyctereutes procyonoides) were the most frequent scavenger to first detect carcasses. However, we found no evidence of there being species that signal the location of carrion to other species via social cues. Instead, higher temperatures promoted earlier detection of the carcasses by scavengers, likely related to increased olfactory signals. The carcasses were completely consumed on average in 7.0 days, reasonably similar to other systems regardless of habitat, indicating that facultative scavengers are providing ecosystem services. Larger carcasses tended to take longer to deplete, but carcasses were consumed faster in warmer temperatures. Our results indicate that facultative scavengers were capable of consuming carrion and contributing ecosystem services in a forest ecosystem that lacks obligate scavengers.

Indexed as

EcosystemFood ChainAnimalsFeeding BehaviorFishesForestsMammalsVertebrates

Identifiers

PMID36180480
PMCPMC9525280

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.