Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36180462›Full record

ArticleNature communications2022

Climate change may outpace current wheat breeding yield improvements in North America.

Tianyi Zhang, Yong He, Ron DePauw, Zhenong Jin, David Garvin, Xu Yue, Weston Anderson, Tao Li, Xin Dong, Tao Zhang and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Harnessing polyploidy for climate-resilient crops: Lessons from the evolutionary model, allotetraploid cotton.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Tianyi Zhang *State Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Boundary Layer Physics and Atmospheric Chemistry, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China. zhangty@mail.iap.ac.cn.ORCID 0000-0002-9266-6082
Yong He *Institute of Environment and Sustainable Development in Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China. heyong01@caas.cn.ORCID 0000-0003-4062-9201
Ron DePauwAdvancing Wheat Technologies, 118 Strathcona Rd SW, Calgary, AB, T3H 1P3, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7058-4801
Zhenong JinDepartment of Bioproducts and Biosystems Engineering, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1252-2514
David GarvinFormerly USDA-ARS Plant Science Research Unit, St. Paul, MN, USA.
Xu YueSchool of Environmental Science and Engineering, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8861-8192
Weston AndersonThe International Research Institute for Climate and Society, Palisades, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3755-9943
Tao LiDNDC Applications, Research and Training, 87 Packers Falls Road, Durham, NH, 03824, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1360-1396
Xin DongState Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Boundary Layer Physics and Atmospheric Chemistry, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Tao ZhangInstitute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Xiaoguang YangCollege of Resources and Environmental Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China. yangxg@cau.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Variety adaptation to future climate for wheat is important but lacks comprehensive understanding. Here, we evaluate genetic advancement under current and future climate using a dataset of wheat breeding nurseries in North America during 1960-2018. Results show that yields declined by 3.6% per 1 °C warming for advanced winter wheat breeding lines, compared with -5.5% for the check variety, indicating a superior climate-resilience. However, advanced spring wheat breeding lines showed a 7.5% yield reduction per 1 °C warming, which is more sensitive than a 7.1% reduction for the check variety, indicating climate resilience is not improved and may even decline for spring wheat. Under future climate of SSP scenarios, yields of winter and spring wheat exhibit declining trends even with advanced breeding lines, suggesting future climate warming could outpace the yield gains from current breeding progress. Our study highlights that the adaptation progress following the current wheat breeding strategies is challenging.

Indexed as

Climate ChangeTriticumNorth AmericaPlant BreedingSeasons

Identifiers

PMID36180462
PMCPMC9525655

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.