Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36180415›Full record

ReviewPlant, cell & environment2022

Environmental interference of plant-microbe interactions.

Daniel A Bastías, Raffaella Balestrini, Stephan Pollmann, Pedro E Gundel

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Plant, cell & environment, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
12.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. From grass to legume: employingFrontiers in plant science · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Community Structure Diversity of Endophytic Fungi inJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Global Change Factors Influence Plant-Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 5 countries.

Daniel A BastíasAgResearch Limited, Grasslands Research Centre, Palmerston North, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-0522-5538
Raffaella BalestriniNational Research Council, Institute for Sustainable Plant Protection, Torino, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7958-7681
Stephan PollmannCentro de Biotecnología y Genómica de Plantas, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM)-Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentación (INIA/CSIC), Campus de Montegancedo, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-5111-4425
Pedro E GundelIFEVA, CONICET, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Facultad de Agronomía, Buenos Aires, Argentina.ORCID 0000-0003-3246-0282
AgResearch · NZInstitute for Sustainable Plant Protection · ITInstituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria · ESUniversity of Talca · CL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Environmental stresses can compromise the interactions of plants with beneficial microbes. In the present review, experimental results showing that stresses negatively affect the abundance and/or functionality of plant beneficial microbes are summarized. It is proposed that the environmental interference of these plant-microbe interactions is explained by the stress-mediated induction of plant signalling pathways associated with defence hormones and reactive oxygen species. These plant responses are recognized to regulate beneficial microbes within plants. The direct negative effect of stresses on microbes may also contribute to the environmental regulation of these plant mutualisms. It is also posited that, in stress situations, beneficial microbes harbour mechanisms that contribute to maintain the mutualistic associations. Beneficial microbes produce effector proteins and increase the antioxidant levels in plants that counteract the detrimental effects of plant stress responses on them. In addition, they deliver specific stress-protective mechanisms that assist to their plant hosts to mitigate the negative effects of stresses. Our study contributes to understanding how environmental stresses affect plant-microbe interactions and highlights why beneficial microbes can still deliver benefits to plants in stressful environments.

Indexed as

PlantsSymbiosisStress, Physiologicalabiotic and biotic stressesantioxidantseffectorsendophytesmycorrhizaephytohormonesreactive nitrogen speciesreactive oxygen species

Identifiers

PMID36180415
PMCPMC9828629
OpenAlexW4298111571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.