Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36180354›Full record

Observational studyJournal of healthcare quality research

Psychological repercussions on nursing staff due to the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional study.

D Martínez-Ponce, M A Amat-Traconis, L Y Cala-Rosabal, E Chapan-Xolio, L Valenzuela-Velázquez, M G Lecourtois-Amézquita

Open access · greenAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of healthcare quality research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. [Repairing after COVID-19].Journal of healthcare quality research
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

D Martínez-PonceGeneral Hospital of Boca del Río, Veracruz, Mexico.
M A Amat-TraconisGeneral Hospital of Boca del Río, Veracruz, Mexico.
L Y Cala-RosabalGeneral Hospital of Boca del Río, Veracruz, Mexico.
E Chapan-XolioGeneral Hospital of Boca del Río, Veracruz, Mexico.
L Valenzuela-VelázquezGeneral Hospital of Boca del Río, Veracruz, Mexico.
M G Lecourtois-AmézquitaGeneral Hospital of Boca del Río, Veracruzana University, Faculty of Medicine, Veracruz, Mexico. Electronic address: hgbr.lecourtois@gmail.com.
Federal Government of Mexico · MXUniversidad Veracruzana · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has caused a high demand for health services, especially nursing. This workload can lead to emotional distress affecting their daily lives on a personal and professional basis.

objectiveTo examine the prevalence of depression, anxiety, and stress in nurses and to analyze the factors associated with their presence during the COVID-19 pandemic.

methodsAn observational cross-sectional descriptive study was carried out in a second-level hospital in Mexico between September and October 2020. Within a population of 150 nurses invited to the study, 116 participated by answering a questionnaire regarding emotional aspects during their time caring for COVID-19 patients, as well as using the depression, anxiety, and stress scale (DASS-21).

resultsAmong de 116 participants, 77.6% were females, and 22.4% were males. The 91.4% reported fear of spreading the disease to their families, and 59.5% reported that the death of their patients infected with COVID-19 affected them deeply. The factors associated with moderate to extremely severe levels of depression were the attitude of indifference from the community to their work during the pandemic (OR:2.66) and the increase consumption of addictive substances (OR:9.80). In the stress subscale, the variables that conferred a significant association was working inside the COVID-19 area (OR:17.05), being severely affected by the death of patients infected (OR:4.23), and fear of entering the red zone (OR:19.47). The need for psychological care was associated with moderate to severe depression and anxiety (OR:7.38, OR:9.50, respectively). For the anxiety subscale, no association with the studied variables was found.

conclusionsThe study indicates a high prevalence of emotional distress among nurses, and that there were working, psychological and social factors associated with symptoms of depression and stress. Future research should focus on prevention measures and strategies to reduce psychological impact, as this could affect the quality of care provided to their patients.

Indexed as

COVID-19Nursing StaffCross-Sectional StudiesDepressionFemaleHumansMalePandemicsSARS-CoV-2AnsiedadAnxietyCOVID-19DepresiónDepressionEnfermeríaEstrésNursingStress

Identifiers

PMID36180354
PMCPMC9411133
OpenAlexW4293217172

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.