Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36180106›Full record

ArticleLupus science & medicine2022

CD4

Kittikorn Wangriatisak, Piyawan Kochayoo, Pongsakorn Thawornpan, Chaniya Leepiyasakulchai, Thanitta Suangtamai, Pintip Ngamjanyaporn, Ladawan Khowawisetsut, Prasong Khaenam, Prapaporn Pisitkun, Patchanee Chootong

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Lupus science & medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Engineered Foxp1Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kittikorn WangriatisakDepartment of Clinical Microbiology and Applied Technology, Faculty of Medical Technology, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0001-6642-076X
Piyawan KochayooDepartment of Clinical Microbiology and Applied Technology, Faculty of Medical Technology, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Pongsakorn ThawornpanDepartment of Clinical Microbiology and Applied Technology, Faculty of Medical Technology, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Chaniya LeepiyasakulchaiDepartment of Clinical Microbiology and Applied Technology, Faculty of Medical Technology, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Thanitta SuangtamaiDivision of Allergy, Immunology and Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Pintip NgamjanyapornDivision of Allergy, Immunology and Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0001-7948-1748
Ladawan KhowawisetsutDepartment of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Prasong KhaenamCenter of Standardization and Product Validation, Faculty of Medical Technology, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Prapaporn PisitkunDivision of Allergy, Immunology and Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Patchanee ChootongDepartment of Clinical Microbiology and Applied Technology, Faculty of Medical Technology, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand pchooton@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-6642-076X
Mahidol University · THSiriraj Hospital · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo explore cooperation between activated naïve (aNAV) B cells and CD4

methodsPeripheral blood mononuclear cell samples were obtained from 31 patients with SLE and used to characterise phenotype of aNAV B cells (n=14) and measured the phosphorylation of B-cell receptor (BCR) signalling molecules (n=5). Upregulation of T-cell costimulatory molecules after BCR and toll-like receptor (TLR)-7/TLR-8 stimulation was detected in cells from four subjects. To explore the role of these cells in SLE pathogenesis via T cell-dependent mechanisms, four subjects were analysed to detect the promotion of CD4

resultsThe aNAV B cells of patients with SLE had increased expression of surface CD40, HLA-DR and interleukin-21 receptor (IL-21R) and FCRL5 molecules. With BCR stimulation, these cells greatly increased PLCγ2 phosphorylation. Integrated BCR and TLR-7/TLR-8 signals induced overexpression of CD40, CD86, IL-21R and HLA-DR on lupus aNAV B cells. In T-cell-B-cell cocultures, lupus aNAV B cells (with upregulated costimulatory molecules) promoted CD4

conclusionCooperation between aNAV B cells and CD4

Indexed as

Lupus Erythematosus, SystemicT-LymphocytesAntibodies, AntinuclearCD4-Positive T-LymphocytesCytokinesHLA-DR AntigensHumansInterleukin-23Interleukin-6Interleukin-8Leukocytes, MononuclearPhospholipase C gammaReceptors, Antigen, B-CellToll-Like Receptor 7Toll-Like Receptor 8Antibodies, AntinuclearCytokinesHLA-DR AntigensInterleukin-23Interleukin-6Interleukin-8Phospholipase C gammaReceptors, Antigen, B-CellToll-Like Receptor 7Toll-Like Receptor 8autoimmunityB-Lymphocyteslupus erythematosus, systemic

Identifiers

PMID36180106
PMCPMC9528597
OpenAlexW4298149513

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.