Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36180103›Full record

ArticleBMJ open respiratory research2022

Pragmatic randomised controlled trials in COPD and asthma: how to guide clinical practice.

Nawar Diar Bakerly, Kirill Nikitin, Neil G Snowise, Glenn Cardwell, Daryl Freeman, Ravijyot Saggu, Anthony De Soyza

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open respiratory research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01551758 phase3completednot on this map

A 12-month, Open Label, Randomised, Effectiveness Study to Evaluate Fluticasone Furoate (FF, GW685698)/Vilanterol (VI, GW642444) Inhalation Powder Delivered Once Daily Via a Novel Dry Powder Inhaler (NDPI) Compared With the Existing COPD Maintenance Therapy Alone in Subjects With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)

TypeinterventionalSponsorGlaxoSmithKlineRan2012 to 2015Enrolled2,802ConditionsPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveArmsFF/VI, Existing Maintenance Therapy
NCT01706198 phase3completednot on this map

A 12-month, Open Label, Randomised, Effectiveness Study to Evaluate Fluticasone Furoate (FF, GW685698)/Vilanterol (VI, GW642444) Inhalation Powder Delivered Once Daily Via a Novel Dry Powder Inhaler Compared With Usual Maintenance Therapy in Subjects With Asthma

TypeinterventionalSponsorGlaxoSmithKlineRan2012 to 2016Enrolled4,233ConditionsAsthmaArmsfluticasone furoate + vilanterol, inhaled corticosteroid with or without a long acting beta2-agonist
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Nawar Diar BakerlySchool of Biological Sciences, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK.
Kirill NikitinRespiratory Department, GSK, Brentford, UK.
Neil G SnowiseInstitute of Pharmaceutical Science, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College, London, UK.
Glenn CardwellRespiratory Department, GSK, Brentford, UK.
Daryl FreemanNorfolk Community Health and Care, Woodlands House, Norwich, UK.
Ravijyot SagguPharmacy Department, University College Hospital, NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Anthony De SoyzaPopulation and Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK anthony.de-soyza@newcastle.ac.uk.
King's College London · GBManchester Metropolitan University · GBNewcastle University · GBNorfolk Community Health and Care NHS Trust · GBUniversity College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of real-world evidence (RWE) studies, including pragmatic randomised controlled trials (RCTs; randomised RWE studies), to aid the development of treatment guidelines, is gradually becoming a mainstay within clinical practice. RWE is an integral part of patient-driven decision-making and offers important value to add complimentary evidence to traditional RCTs; these provide a more well-rounded view of the benefits to patient-reported outcomes and improve the external validity of a given treatment versus findings from traditional RCTs alone. Discussions in recent scientific workshops explored the importance of pragmatic RCTs in optimising guideline development and patient care in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma. The Salford Lung Study in patients with COPD (NCT01551758) and asthma (NCT01706198) were the world's first prelicence pragmatic RCTs that compared novel investigational treatments with existing COPD and asthma treatments and, more recently (2021), RWE studies have been used by the American Thoracic Society and the US Food and Drug Administration to support the approval of an immunosuppressant drug in patients receiving lung transplants. This highlights the importance of RWE data in supporting clinical guideline development and emphasises the advantages for the use of pragmatic RCTs in guiding clinical practice.

Indexed as

AsthmaPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicUnited StatesImmunosuppressive AgentsAsthma Guidelines

Identifiers

PMID36180103
PMCPMC9528570
OpenAlexW4298149557

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.