Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36180071›Full record

ReviewJournal for immunotherapy of cancer2022

Artificial intelligence and radiomics: fundamentals, applications, and challenges in immunotherapy.

Laurent Dercle, Jeremy McGale, Shawn Sun, Aurelien Marabelle, Randy Yeh, Eric Deutsch, Fatima-Zohra Mokrane, Michael Farwell, Samy Ammari, Heiko Schoder and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal for immunotherapy of cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. CT radiomics showed no improvement beyond volume dynamics for early lesion-level size response to immunotherapy in metastatic melanoma.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2026
    Observational
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Monitoring Pharmacological Treatment of Breast Cancer with MRI.Current issues in molecular biology · 2025
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Laurent Dercle *Radiology, NewYork-Presbyterian/Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA laurent.dercle@gmail.com.
Jeremy McGale *Radiology, NewYork-Presbyterian/Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
Shawn SunRadiology, NewYork-Presbyterian/Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
Aurelien MarabelleTherapeutic Innovation and Early Trials, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, Île-de-France, France.ORCID 0000-0002-5816-3019
Randy YehMolecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Eric DeutschRadiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, Île-de-France, France.
Fatima-Zohra MokraneRadiology, Hospital Rangueil, Toulouse, Occitanie, France.
Michael FarwellDivision of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Samy AmmariRadiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, Île-de-France, France.
Heiko SchoderRadiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Binsheng ZhaoRadiology, NewYork-Presbyterian/Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
Lawrence H SchwartzRadiology, NewYork-Presbyterian/Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
SHORT-TERM TRAINING: STUDENTS IN PROFESSIONAL SCHOOLST35HL007616 · NHLBI · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI RUDOLPH L LEIBEL, Markus Y Mapara · 1985 to 2026
$4.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NHLBI NIH HHS T35 HL007616
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immunotherapy offers the potential for durable clinical benefit but calls into question the association between tumor size and outcome that currently forms the basis for imaging-guided treatment. Artificial intelligence (AI) and radiomics allow for discovery of novel patterns in medical images that can increase radiology's role in management of patients with cancer, although methodological issues in the literature limit its clinical application. Using keywords related to immunotherapy and radiomics, we performed a literature review of MEDLINE, CENTRAL, and Embase from database inception through February 2022. We removed all duplicates, non-English language reports, abstracts, reviews, editorials, perspectives, case reports, book chapters, and non-relevant studies. From the remaining articles, the following information was extracted: publication information, sample size, primary tumor site, imaging modality, primary and secondary study objectives, data collection strategy (retrospective vs prospective, single center vs multicenter), radiomic signature validation strategy, signature performance, and metrics for calculation of a Radiomics Quality Score (RQS). We identified 351 studies, of which 87 were unique reports relevant to our research question. The median (IQR) of cohort sizes was 101 (57-180). Primary stated goals for radiomics model development were prognostication (n=29, 33.3%), treatment response prediction (n=24, 27.6%), and characterization of tumor phenotype (n=14, 16.1%) or immune environment (n=13, 14.9%). Most studies were retrospective (n=75, 86.2%) and recruited patients from a single center (n=57, 65.5%). For studies with available information on model testing, most (n=54, 65.9%) used a validation set or better. Performance metrics were generally highest for radiomics signatures predicting treatment response or tumor phenotype, as opposed to immune environment and overall prognosis. Out of a possible maximum of 36 points, the median (IQR) of RQS was 12 (10-16). While a rapidly increasing number of promising results offer proof of concept that AI and radiomics could drive precision medicine approaches for a wide range of indications, standardizing the data collection as well as optimizing the methodological quality and rigor are necessary before these results can be translated into clinical practice.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceNeoplasmsHumansImmunologic FactorsImmunotherapyMulticenter Studies as TopicProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesImmunologic Factorsimmunologic surveillanceimmunotherapyreviewtranslational medical researchtumor biomarkers

Identifiers

PMID36180071
PMCPMC9528623

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.