Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36179734›Full record

ReviewThe Lancet. Global health2022

Pandemic preparedness and response: exploring the role of universal health coverage within the global health security architecture.

Arush Lal, Salma M Abdalla, Vijay Kumar Chattu, Ngozi Adaeze Erondu, Tsung-Ling Lee, Sudhvir Singh, Hala Abou-Taleb, Jeanette Vega Morales, Alexandra Phelan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Lancet. Global health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 67 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
67citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

67 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Arush LalDepartment of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK. Electronic address: arush.lal@gmail.com.
Salma M AbdallaDepartment of Epidemiology, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Vijay Kumar ChattuCenter for Interdisciplinary Research, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, India; Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences, Wardha, India; Department of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Ngozi Adaeze EronduO'Neill Institute for National and Global Health Law, Georgetown University Law Center, Washington, DC, USA; Global Health Institute for Disease Elimination, United Arab Emirates Global Health Programme, Chatham House, London, UK.
Tsung-Ling LeeGraduate Institute of Health and Biotechnology Law, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Sudhvir SinghDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Hala Abou-TalebHealth System Governance Team, Department of Universal Health Coverage/Health Systems, Regional Office for the Eastern Mediterranean, World Health Organization, Cairo, Egypt.
Jeanette Vega MoralesMinistry of Social Development and Family, Santiago, Chile.
Alexandra PhelanO'Neill Institute for National and Global Health Law, Georgetown University Law Center, Washington, DC, USA; Center for Global Health Science and Security, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, several international initiatives have been developed to strengthen and reform the global architecture for pandemic preparedness and response, including proposals for a pandemic treaty, a Pandemic Fund, and mechanisms for equitable access to medical countermeasures. These initiatives seek to make use of crucial lessons gleaned from the ongoing pandemic by addressing gaps in health security and traditional public health functions. However, there has been insufficient consideration of the vital role of universal health coverage in sustainably mitigating outbreaks, and the importance of robust primary health care in equitably and efficiently safeguarding communities from future health threats. The international community should not repeat the mistakes of past health security efforts that ultimately contributed to the rapid spread of the COVID-19 pandemic and disproportionately affected vulnerable and marginalised populations, especially by overlooking the importance of coherent, multisectoral health systems. This Health Policy paper outlines major (although often neglected) gaps in pandemic preparedness and response, which are applicable to broader health emergency preparedness and response efforts, and identifies opportunities to reconceptualise health security by scaling up universal health coverage. We then offer a comprehensive set of recommendations to help inform the development of key pandemic preparedness and response proposals across three themes-governance, financing, and supporting initiatives. By identifying approaches that simultaneously strengthen health systems through global health security and universal health coverage, we aim to provide tangible solutions that equitably meet the needs of all communities while ensuring resilience to future pandemic threats.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsGlobal HealthHumansInternational CooperationUniversal Health Insurance

Identifiers

PMID36179734
PMCPMC9514836

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.