ArticleInternational journal of medical informatics2022
Leveraging weak supervision to perform named entity recognition in electronic health records progress notes to identify the ophthalmology exam.
Article in International journal of medical informatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Improving Clinical Documentation with Artificial Intelligence: A Systematic Review.Perspectives in health information management · 2024Pooled it
- Automatic identification of diagnosis from hospital discharge letters via weakly supervised Natural Language Processing.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Large Language Models in Ophthalmology: A Bibliographic Analysis.Turkish journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Benchmarking GPT-5, LLaMA, and Mistral for Clinical Named Entity Recognition in Ophthalmology Progress Notes.Translational vision science & technology · 2026Article
- Leveraging Large Language Models with Sequential Prompting to Extract Eye Examination Findings from Free-Text Ophthalmology Notes.Ophthalmology science · 2026Article
- Multicenter evaluation of machine and deep learning methods to predict glaucoma surgical outcomes.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Article
- Health Care Language Models and Their Fine-Tuning for Information Extraction: Scoping Review.JMIR medical informatics · 2024Article
- Utilizing Large Language Models in Ophthalmology: The Current Landscape and Challenges.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2024Review
- Predicting Glaucoma Surgical Outcomes Using Neural Networks and Machine Learning on Electronic Health Records.Translational vision science & technology · 2024Article
- Automated Category and Trend Analysis of Scientific Articles on Ophthalmology Using Large Language Models: Development and Usability Study.JMIR formative research · 2024Article
- Evaluating the Performance of Large Language Models for Named Entity Recognition in Ophthalmology Clinical Free-Text Notes.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2024Article
- Generative Artificial Intelligence Through ChatGPT and Other Large Language Models in Ophthalmology: Clinical Applications and Challenges.Ophthalmology science · 2023Article
- Named Entity Recognition in Electronic Health Records: A Methodological Review.Healthcare informatics research · 2023Article
- Comparison of Ophthalmologist and Large Language Model Chatbot Responses to Online Patient Eye Care Questions.JAMA network open · 2023Article
- Generative artificial intelligence in ophthalmology research writing: A comprehensive review of applications, detection tools, and ethical considerations.Taiwan journal of ophthalmologyReview
- Automated Recognition of Visual Acuity Measurements in Ophthalmology Clinical Notes Using Deep Learning.Ophthalmology scienceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo develop deep learning models to recognize ophthalmic examination components from clinical notes in electronic health records (EHR) using a weak supervision approach.
methodsA corpus of 39,099 ophthalmology notes weakly labeled for 24 examination entities was assembled from the EHR of one academic center. Four pre-trained transformer-based language models (DistilBert, BioBert, BlueBert, and ClinicalBert) were fine-tuned to this named entity recognition task and compared to a baseline regular expression model. Models were evaluated on the weakly labeled test dataset, a human-labeled sample of that set, and a human-labeled independent dataset.
resultsOn the weakly labeled test set, all transformer-based models had recall > 0.93, with precision varying from 0.815 to 0.843. The baseline model had lower recall (0.769) and precision (0.682). On the human-annotated sample, the baseline model had high recall (0.962, 95 % CI 0.955-0.067) with variable precision across entities (0.081-0.999). Bert models had recall ranging from 0.771 to 0.831, and precision >=0.973. On the independent dataset, precision was 0.926 and recall 0.458 for BlueBert. The baseline model had better recall (0.708, 95 % CI 0.674-0.738) but worse precision (0.399, 95 % CI -0.352-0.451).
conclusionWe developed the first deep learning system to recognize eye examination components from clinical notes, leveraging a novel opportunity for weak supervision. Transformer-based models had high precision on human-annotated labels, whereas the baseline model had poor precision but higher recall. This system may be used to improve cohort and feature identification using free-text notes.Our weakly supervised approach may help amass large datasets of domain-specific entities from EHRs in many fields.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.