ArticleBlood2023
Description of a novel subtype of acute myeloid leukemia defined by recurrent CBFB insertions.
Article in Blood, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Disrupting the CBFβ-SMMHC-RUNX1 oncogenic protein-protein interaction in inv(16) AML: from fusion biology to targeted therapy.Discover oncology · 2026Review
- Review
- Novel classification system and high-risk categories of pediatric acute myeloid leukemia.Haematologica · 2025Review
- A new genomic framework to categorize pediatric acute myeloid leukemia.Nature genetics · 2024Article
- Proteogenomic analysis reveals cytoplasmic sequestration of RUNX1 by the acute myeloid leukemia-initiating CBFB::MYH11 oncofusion protein.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.