ArticleInternational journal of epidemiology2023
Sex differences in childhood cancer risk among children with major birth defects: a Nordic population-based nested case-control study.
Article in International journal of epidemiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Lifetime risk of solid tumors and leukemia in Down Syndrome: a population-based Swedish matched cohort study.British journal of cancer · 2026Article
- Co-occurrence of congenital anomalies and childhood brain tumors in 22 million live births.Neuro-oncology · 2025Article
- Risk of carcinomas among children and adolescents with birth defects.Cancer epidemiology · 2025Article
- Cancer risk in individuals with polydactyly: a Swedish population-based cohort study.British journal of cancer · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
12 authors at 8 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChildhood cancer is more common among children with birth defects, suggesting a common aetiology. Whether this association differs by sex is unclear.
methodsWe performed a population-based nested case-control study using nationwide health registries in four Nordic countries. We included 21 898 cancer cases (0-19 years) and 218 980 matched population controls, born 1967-2014. Associations between childhood cancer and major birth defects were calculated as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using logistic regression models. Effect modification was evaluated using a counterfactual framework to estimate confidence intervals and P-values for the natural indirect effects.
resultsBirth defects were present for 5.1% (1117/21 898) of childhood cancer cases and 2.2% (4873/218 980) of controls; OR of cancer was higher for chromosomal (OR = 10, 95% CI = 8.6-12) than for non-chromosomal defects (OR = 1.9, 95% CI = 1.8-2.1), strongest between genetic syndromes/microdeletion and renal tumours, Down syndrome and leukaemia, and nervous system defects and central nervous system tumours. The association between birth defects and cancer was stronger among females (OR = 2.8, 95% CI = 2.6-3.1) than males (OR = 2.1, 95% CI = 1.9-2.2, Pinteraction <0.001). Male sex was an independent risk factor for childhood cancer, but very little of the overall association between sex and childhood cancer was mediated through birth defects (4.8%, PNIE <0.001), although more at younger ages (10% below years and 28% below 1 year).
conclusionsThe birth defect-cancer associations were generally stronger among females than males. Birth defects did not act as a strong mediator for the modest differences in childhood cancer risk by sex, suggesting that other biological pathways are involved.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.