Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36178939›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Modeling protected species distributions and habitats to inform siting and management of pioneering ocean industries: A case study for Gulf of Mexico aquaculture.

Nicholas A Farmer, Jessica R Powell, James A Morris, Melissa S Soldevilla, Lisa C Wickliffe, Jonathan A Jossart, Jonathan K MacKay, Alyssa L Randall, Gretchen E Bath, Penny Ruvelas and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Nicholas A FarmerNOAA/National Marine Fisheries Service, Southeast Regional Office, St. Petersburg, Florida, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-6551-4737
Jessica R PowellNOAA/National Marine Fisheries Service, Southeast Regional Office, St. Petersburg, Florida, United States of America.
James A MorrisNOAA/National Ocean Service, National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science, Beaufort, North Carolina, United States of America.
Melissa S SoldevillaNOAA/National Marine Fisheries Service, Southeast Fisheries Science Center, Miami, Florida, United States of America.
Lisa C WickliffeCSS, Inc. under contract to the National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science, National Ocean Service, NOAA, Beaufort, North Carolina, United States of America.
Jonathan A JossartCSS, Inc. under contract to the National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science, National Ocean Service, NOAA, Beaufort, North Carolina, United States of America.
Jonathan K MacKayCSS, Inc. under contract to the National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science, National Ocean Service, NOAA, Beaufort, North Carolina, United States of America.
Alyssa L RandallCSS, Inc. under contract to the National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science, National Ocean Service, NOAA, Beaufort, North Carolina, United States of America.
Gretchen E BathCSS, Inc. under contract to the National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science, National Ocean Service, NOAA, Beaufort, North Carolina, United States of America.
Penny RuvelasNOAA/National Marine Fisheries Service, West Coast Regional Office, Long Beach, California, United States of America.
Laura GrayNOAA/National Marine Fisheries Service, Office of Protected Resources, Silver Spring, Maryland, United States of America.
Jennifer LeeNOAA/National Marine Fisheries Service, Southeast Regional Office, St. Petersburg, Florida, United States of America.
Wendy PiniakNOAA/National Marine Fisheries Service, Office of Protected Resources, Silver Spring, Maryland, United States of America.
Lance GarrisonNOAA/National Marine Fisheries Service, Southeast Fisheries Science Center, Miami, Florida, United States of America.
Robert HardyNOAA/National Marine Fisheries Service, Southeast Fisheries Science Center, Miami, Florida, United States of America.
Kristen M HartU.S. Geological Survey, Wetland and Aquatic Research Center, Davie, Florida, United States of America.
Chris SassoNOAA/National Marine Fisheries Service, Southeast Fisheries Science Center, Miami, Florida, United States of America.
Lesley StokesNOAA/National Marine Fisheries Service, Southeast Fisheries Science Center, Miami, Florida, United States of America.
Kenneth L RileyNOAA/National Ocean Service, National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science, Beaufort, North Carolina, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Marine Spatial Planning (MSP) provides a process that uses spatial data and models to evaluate environmental, social, economic, cultural, and management trade-offs when siting (i.e., strategically locating) ocean industries. Aquaculture is the fastest-growing food sector in the world. The United States (U.S.) has substantial opportunity for offshore aquaculture development given the size of its exclusive economic zone, habitat diversity, and variety of candidate species for cultivation. However, promising aquaculture areas overlap many protected species habitats. Aquaculture siting surveys, construction, operations, and decommissioning can alter protected species habitat and behavior. Additionally, aquaculture-associated vessel activity, underwater noise, and physical interactions between protected species and farms can increase the risk of injury and mortality. In 2020, the U.S. Gulf of Mexico was identified as one of the first regions to be evaluated for offshore aquaculture opportunities as directed by a Presidential Executive Order. We developed a transparent and repeatable method to identify aquaculture opportunity areas (AOAs) with the least conflict with protected species. First, we developed a generalized scoring approach for protected species that captures their vulnerability to adverse effects from anthropogenic activities using conservation status and demographic information. Next, we applied this approach to data layers for eight species listed under the Endangered Species Act, including five species of sea turtles, Rice's whale, smalltooth sawfish, and giant manta ray. Next, we evaluated four methods for mathematically combining scores (i.e., Arithmetic mean, Geometric mean, Product, Lowest Scoring layer) to generate a combined protected species data layer. The Product approach provided the most logical ordering of, and the greatest contrast in, site suitability scores. Finally, we integrated the combined protected species data layer into a multi-criteria decision-making modeling framework for MSP. This process identified AOAs with reduced potential for protected species conflict. These modeling methods are transferable to other regions, to other sensitive or protected species, and for spatial planning for other ocean-uses.

Indexed as

EcosystemElasmobranchiiAnimalsAquacultureConservation of Natural ResourcesEndangered SpeciesGulf of America

Identifiers

PMID36178939
PMCPMC9524655

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.