Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36178919›Full record

Observational studyPloS one2022

Analysis of predicted factors for bronchoalveolar lavage recovery failure: An observational study.

Masafumi Shimoda, Yoshiaki Tanaka, Kozo Morimoto, Taro Abe, Reina Asaga, Kei Nakajima, Ken Okamura, Kozo Yoshimori, Ken Ohta

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Masafumi ShimodaRespiratory Disease Center, Fukujuji Hospital, Japan Anti-Tuberculosis Association (JATA), Kiyose City, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-2465-0118
Yoshiaki TanakaRespiratory Disease Center, Fukujuji Hospital, Japan Anti-Tuberculosis Association (JATA), Kiyose City, Tokyo, Japan.
Kozo MorimotoRespiratory Disease Center, Fukujuji Hospital, Japan Anti-Tuberculosis Association (JATA), Kiyose City, Tokyo, Japan.
Taro AbeRespiratory Disease Center, Fukujuji Hospital, Japan Anti-Tuberculosis Association (JATA), Kiyose City, Tokyo, Japan.
Reina AsagaRespiratory Disease Center, Fukujuji Hospital, Japan Anti-Tuberculosis Association (JATA), Kiyose City, Tokyo, Japan.
Kei NakajimaRespiratory Disease Center, Fukujuji Hospital, Japan Anti-Tuberculosis Association (JATA), Kiyose City, Tokyo, Japan.
Ken OkamuraRespiratory Disease Center, Fukujuji Hospital, Japan Anti-Tuberculosis Association (JATA), Kiyose City, Tokyo, Japan.
Kozo YoshimoriRespiratory Disease Center, Fukujuji Hospital, Japan Anti-Tuberculosis Association (JATA), Kiyose City, Tokyo, Japan.
Ken OhtaRespiratory Disease Center, Fukujuji Hospital, Japan Anti-Tuberculosis Association (JATA), Kiyose City, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-9734-4579
Japan Anti Tuberculosis Association · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) recovery rate should generally be more than 30% for effective diagnosis. However, there have been no reports investigating a target bronchus for BAL, and the cause of BAL recovery failure is uncertain. Therefore, this study detected predictive factors for BAL recovery failure through investigations on a target bronchus for BAL by using a 3D image analysis system. Therefore, this study detected predictive factors for BAL recovery failure. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe retrospectively collected data from 338 adult patients who underwent BAL procedures at Fukujuji Hospital from June 2018-March 2022. Factors correlated with the BAL recovery rate were detected. Furthermore, the patients were divided into the failure group (recovery rate <30%; 36 patients) and the success group (recovery rate ≥30%; 302 patients), and data were compared between the two groups by analysing the target bronchus by using a 3D image analysis system.

resultsThe patients in the failure group were older (median 74.5 years old [IQR 68.0-79.0] vs. median 70.0 years old [IQR 59.0-76.0], p = 0.016), more likely to be male (n = 27 [75.0%] vs. n = 172 [57.0%], p = 0.048), more likely to have COPD (n = 7 [19.4%] vs. n = 14 [4.6%], p = 0.003), and more likely to perform a target site of BAL other than the middle/lingual lobe (n = 11 [30.5%] vs. n = 35 [11.6%], p = 0.004) than those in the success group. The area of the bronchial wall was positively related to the recovery rate (r = 0.141, p = 0.009), and the area of the bronchial wall in the failure group was lower than that in the success group (median 10.5 mm2 [interquartile range (IQR) 8.1-14.6] vs. median 14.5 mm2 [11.4-19.0], p<0.001).

conclusionThe study shows that a thin bronchial wall, COPD, and a target site of BAL other than the middle/lingual lobe were identified as the predicted factors for BAL recovery failure. The weakness of the bronchial wall might cause bronchial collapse during the BAL procedure.

Indexed as

BronchiPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveAdultAgedBronchoalveolar LavageBronchoalveolar Lavage FluidFemaleHumansMaleRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID36178919
PMCPMC9524652
OpenAlexW4298086850

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.