Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36178688›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2022

Associations of Age at Diagnosis and Duration of Diabetes With Morbidity and Mortality Among Older Adults.

Christine T Cigolle, Caroline S Blaum, Chen Lyu, Jinkyung Ha, Mohammed Kabeto, Judy Zhong

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Age at diabetes diagnosis and fracture risk in women: a cohort study from the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women's Health.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2025
    Article
  8. Comorbidity patterns and mortality in HFpEF: A retrospective longitudinal cohort study.International journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Christine T CigolleDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Caroline S BlaumDepartment of Medicine, New York University Langone Health, New York, New York.
Chen LyuDivision of Biostatistics, Department of Population Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York.
Jinkyung HaDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Mohammed KabetoDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Judy ZhongDivision of Biostatistics, Department of Population Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York.
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USNew York University · USNYU Langone Health · US

Funding

EHR-based vs population-based CVD risk predictions for older patients with diabetesR01AG065330 · NIA · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI ZHONG, HUA JUDY · 2020 to 2024
$2.9M
CVD Risk and Outcome Heterogeneity in Older Adults with DiabetesR01AG054467 · NIA · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI BLAUM, CAROLINE S, ZHONG, HUA JUDY · 2017 to 2020
$1.7M
Personalized Risk Predictions with Deep Learning Methods in the Presence of Missing and Biased Electronic Health Record DataR01LM013344 · NLM · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI SMYTH, PADHRAIC, ZHONG, HUA JUDY · 2021 to 2024
$1.3M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG054467NIA NIH HHS R01 AG065330NLM NIH HHS R01 LM013344
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Older adults vary widely in age at diagnosis and duration of type 2 diabetes, but treatment often ignores this heterogeneity. Objectives: To investigate the associations of diabetes vs no diabetes, age at diagnosis, and diabetes duration with negative health outcomes in people 50 years and older. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study included participants in the 1995 through 2018 waves of the Health and Retirement Study (HRS), a population-based, biennial longitudinal health interview survey of older adults in the US. The study sample included adults 50 years or older (n = 36 060) without diabetes at entry. Data were analyzed from June 1, 2021, to July 31, 2022. Exposures: The presence of diabetes, specifically the age at diabetes diagnosis, was the main exposure of the study. Age at diagnosis was defined as the age when the respondent first reported diabetes. Adults who developed diabetes were classified into 3 age-at-diagnosis groups: 50 to 59 years, 60 to 69 years, and 70 years and older. Main Outcomes and Measures: For each diabetes age-at-diagnosis group, a propensity score-matched control group of respondents who never developed diabetes was constructed. The association of diabetes with the incidence of key outcomes-including heart disease, stroke, disability, cognitive impairment, and all-cause mortality-was estimated and the association of diabetes vs no diabetes among the age-at-diagnosis case and matched control groups was compared. Results: A total of 7739 HRS respondents developed diabetes and were included in the analysis (4267 women [55.1%]; mean [SD] age at diagnosis, 67.4 [9.9] years). The age-at-diagnosis groups included 1866 respondents at 50 to 59 years, 2834 at 60 to 69 years, and 3039 at 70 years or older; 28 321 HRS respondents never developed diabetes. Age at diagnosis of 50 to 59 years was significantly associated with incident heart disease (hazard ratio [HR], 1.66 [95% CI, 1.40-1.96]), stroke (HR, 1.64 [95% CI, 1.30-2.07]), disability (HR, 2.08 [95% CI, 1.59-2.72]), cognitive impairment (HR, 1.30 [95% CI, 1.05-1.61]), and mortality (HR, 1.49 [95% CI, 1.29-1.71]) compared with matched controls, even when accounting for diabetes duration. These associations significantly decreased with advancing age at diagnosis. Respondents with diabetes diagnosed at 70 years or older only showed a significant association with the outcome of elevated mortality (HR, 1.08 [95% CI, 1.01-1.17]). Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this cohort study suggest that age at diabetes diagnosis was differentially associated with outcomes and that younger age groups were at elevated risk of heart disease, stroke, disability, cognitive impairment, and all-cause mortality. These findings reinforce the clinical heterogeneity of diabetes and highlight the importance of improving diabetes management in adults with earlier diagnosis.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Heart DiseasesStrokeAgedChildCohort StudiesFemaleHumansIncidenceMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID36178688
PMCPMC9526092
OpenAlexW4298086496

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.