ArticleJournal of nephrology2023
Clinical characteristics, treatment and outcomes of patients with spontaneous renal artery dissections.
Article in Journal of nephrology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Spontaneous renal artery dissection with renal artery stenting: A case report.Urology case reports · 2026Article
- Spontaneous renal artery thrombosis causing circulatory insufficiency in a newborn- a case report.BMC pediatrics · 2025Article
- Characteristics, treatment, and outcomes of spontaneous renal artery dissection: a 10-year retrospective single-center experience.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe natural history and optimal management of spontaneous renal artery dissections (SRADs) are poorly understood. We compared baseline characteristics, presentation, management, and outcomes between patients with symptomatic versus asymptomatic SRADs.
methodsWe performed a retrospective review of medical charts for patients diagnosed with SRAD at a single, tertiary care center. Patients were identified using billing codes. Patient demographics, medical history, clinical presentation, treatment, and follow up were recorded. We compared patients based on presence or absence of symptoms at the time of SRAD diagnosis.
resultsA total of 125 patients were included; 73 (58.4%) patients had symptoms at the time of SRAD diagnosis. Symptomatic patients were younger at the time of diagnosis (47.4 vs. 54.3 years, p = 0.008) and more likely male (74.0% vs. 44.2%, p = 0.005). Most patients received medical therapy (93.2% vs. 82.6%, p = 0.32). Endovascular therapy utilization was low in both groups (8.2% vs. 7.7%, p = 0.9). Outcomes between the two groups were comparable; renal function remained stable, and mortality was rare.
conclusionMost patients who presented with SRAD were treated with medical therapy alone and usually experienced a benign course. Further studies are needed to understand the pathophysiology and natural history of renal artery dissections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36178591What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.