ReviewSurgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA2022
Oculomotor nerve root split: incidental finding on MRI-case report and literature review.
Review in Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe oculomotor nerve (OMN) innervates the pupil, ciliary body, upper eyelid, and extraocular muscles through two divisions: a superior division that innervates the levator palpebrae superioris (LPS) and superior rectus (SR), and an inferior division that supplies the medial rectus (MR), inferior rectus (IR), inferior oblique (IO), and parasympathetic fibers to the pupil and ciliary body. We present a case of complete splitting of the cisternal segment of bilateral OMNs that was discovered incidentally on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in a patient who had no ocular complaints. CASE REPORT: A 69-year-old patient was found to have bilateral splitting of the cisternal segments of OMNs during an MRI for trigeminal neuralgia workup. Both nerves sprang from the midbrain as distinct roots. They were symmetric on the right and minimally asymmetric on the left. On both sides, the medial root was slightly inferiorly situated. The patient had no visual problems and continued to function normally. A review of the literature for similar cases identified no such variants; however, it did identify eight examples of OMN fenestrations produced by aneurysms (AN), six of which had no OMN palsy symptoms.
conclusionAn anatomic variant of split bilateral OMN cisternal segments is described. The superior and inferior divisions may have different brainstem origins. Although this variant is an anatomic curiosity, it may have clinical significance and explain the various presentation of compressive OMN palsies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.