ReviewJournal of women's health (2002)2022
Hypertension: Are Current Guidelines Inclusive of Sex and Gender?
Review in Journal of women's health (2002), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Gender-related determinants of hypertension self-care behaviours in primary care: Perspectives of patients and healthcare professionals.Atencion primaria · 2026Article
- The impact of sex on blood pressure.Current opinion in nephrology and hypertension · 2025Review
- Sex and gender bias in chronic coronary syndromes research: analysis of studies used to inform the 2019 European Society of Cardiology guidelines.The Lancet regional health. Europe · 2024Article
- Gender-Specific Medicine in the European Society of Cardiology Guidelines from 2018 to 2023: Where Are We Going?Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- A tryst of 'blood pressure control- sex- comorbidities': the odyssey of basic public health services in Yunnan in quest for truth.BMC public health · 2024Article
- Effect of SGLT2 inhibition on salt-induced hypertension in female Dahl SS rats.Scientific reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.