Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36178455›Full record

ArticleResearch and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis2022

Lupus anticoagulant associates with thrombosis in patients with COVID-19 admitted to intensive care units: A retrospective cohort study.

Tessa Noordermeer, Roger E G Schutgens, Chantal Visser, Emma Rademaker, Moniek P M de Maat, A J Gerard Jansen, Maarten Limper, Olaf L Cremer, Marieke J H A Kruip, Henrik Endeman and 4 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Corrigendum.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Tessa NoordermeerCenter for Benign Hematology, Thrombosis and Haemostasis, Van Creveldkliniek University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University Utrecht The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2929-4930
Roger E G SchutgensCenter for Benign Hematology, Thrombosis and Haemostasis, Van Creveldkliniek University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University Utrecht The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2762-6033
Chantal VisserDepartment of Hematology, Erasmus MC Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam Rotterdam The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2025-1734
Emma RademakerJulius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care University Medical Center Utrecht Utrecht The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5143-5723
Moniek P M de MaatDepartment of Hematology, Erasmus MC Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam Rotterdam The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7749-334X
A J Gerard JansenDepartment of Hematology, Erasmus MC Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam Rotterdam The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2612-1420
Maarten LimperDepartment of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University Utrecht The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4859-3250
Olaf L CremerIntensive Care Center University Medical Center Utrecht Utrecht The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4264-1108
Marieke J H A KruipDepartment of Hematology, Erasmus MC Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam Rotterdam The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0265-4871
Henrik EndemanDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam Rotterdam The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2011-5169
Coen MaasCentral Diagnostic Laboratory University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University Utrecht The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4593-0976
Bas de LaatDepartment of Biochemistry, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM) Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands Synapse Research Institute Maastricht The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9596-1944
Rolf T UrbanusCenter for Benign Hematology, Thrombosis and Haemostasis, Van Creveldkliniek University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University Utrecht The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1601-9393
Dutch COVID & Thrombosis Coalition (DCTC)
Utrecht University · NLErasmus MC · NLUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NLMaastricht University · NLSynapse (Netherlands) · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Thrombosis is a frequent and severe complication in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). Lupus anticoagulant (LA) is a strong acquired risk factor for thrombosis in various diseases and is frequently observed in patients with COVID-19. Whether LA is associated with thrombosis in patients with severe COVID-19 is currently unclear. Objective: To investigate if LA is associated with thrombosis in critically ill patients with COVID-19. Patients/Methods: The presence of LA and other antiphospholipid antibodies was assessed in patients with COVID-19 admitted to the ICU. LA was determined with dilute Russell's viper venom time (dRVVT) and LA-sensitive activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) reagents. Results: Of 169 patients with COVID-19, 116 (69%) tested positive for at least one antiphospholipid antibody upon admission to the ICU. Forty (24%) patients tested positive for LA; of whom 29 (17%) tested positive with a dRVVT, 19 (11%) tested positive with an LA-sensitive aPTT, and 8 (5%) tested positive on both tests. Fifty-eight (34%) patients developed thrombosis after ICU admission. The odds ratio (OR) for thrombosis in patients with LA based on a dRVVT was 2.5 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-5.7), which increased to 4.5 (95% CI, 1.4-14.3) in patients at or below the median age in this study (64 years). LA positivity based on a dRVVT or LA-sensitive aPTT was only associated with thrombosis in patients aged less than 65 years (OR, 3.8; 95% CI, 1.3-11.4) and disappeared after adjustment for C-reactive protein. Conclusion: Lupus anticoagulant on admission is strongly associated with thrombosis in critically ill patients with COVID-19, especially in patients aged less than 65 years.

Indexed as

COVID‐19critically illlupus anticoagulantrisk factorthrombosis

Identifiers

PMID36178455
PMCPMC9481876
OpenAlexW4296174521

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.