Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36178200›Full record

Trial reportThoracic cancer2022

Patient-reported outcomes of laryngeal mask anesthesia in thoracoscopic pulmonary wedge resection: A randomized controlled study.

Kaikai Xu, Yi Zhang, Yong Cui, Feng Tian

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Thoracic cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07177586 (A Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Study Comparing the Effectiveness of the New Generation GMA Laryngeal Mask and Conventional Laryngeal Mask in Airway Management During General Anesthesia), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07177586 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

A Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Study Comparing the Effectiveness of the New Generation GMA Laryngeal Mask and Conventional Laryngeal Mask in Airway Management During General Anesthesia

TypeinterventionalSponsorFirst Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang UniversityRan2025 to 2027Enrolled1,384ConditionsSupraglottic Airway Devices PositionArmsGMA Laryngeal Mask Airway, Inflatable Laryngeal Mask Airway
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kaikai XuDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Xuanwu Hospital Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0001-9524-8735
Yi ZhangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Xuanwu Hospital Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Yong CuiDepartment of Thoracic surgery, Capital Medical University Affiliated Beijing Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China.
Feng TianDepartment of Thoracic surgery, Capital Medical University Affiliated Beijing Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo assess the effectiveness and safety of laryngeal mask anesthesia (LMA) in thoracoscopic pulmonary wedge resection based on patient-reported outcomes (PROs).

methodsThis randomized controlled trial included 107 patients who underwent thoracoscopic pulmonary wedge resection between June 2017 and December 2021 for pulmonary nodule or pulmonary bullae. In one group, LMA was applied for general anesthesia, and in the other group, endotracheal intubation (ETT) was used.

resultsA total of 107 patients were included in the study. The symptom assessment based on PROs showed that the incidence of pharyngodynia, trachyphonia, and cough were lower in the LMA group, while the postoperative gastrointestinal reaction did not significantly differ between the two groups. The pain score and global satisfaction score were significantly better in the LMA group. The satisfaction degree of anesthesia and the surgical field did not significantly differ between the two groups. The anesthesia recovery time, indwelling days of chest catheter, and postoperative hospital stay of the LMA group were all shorter, while the operation time, intraoperative blood loss and lowest intraoperative oxygen saturation did not significantly differ between the two groups. The highest intraoperative partial pressure of CO

conclusionCompared with ETT, the application of LMA may demonstrate promising advantages in airway management for thoracoscopic pulmonary wedge resection. REGISTRATION NO: of clinical trial (ChiCTR2000034905).

Indexed as

Laryngeal MasksLung DiseasesAnesthesia, GeneralHumansIntubation, IntratrachealPatient Reported Outcome Measuresendotracheal intubation of double lumen tubelaryngeal maskpatient-reported outcomesrandomized controlled trialthoracoscopic pulmonary wedge resection

Identifiers

PMID36178200
PMCPMC9663676

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.