Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36178186›Full record

ArticleClinical and translational allergy2022

Mobile health app for monitoring allergic rhinitis and asthma in real life in Lithuanian MASK-air users.

Violeta Kvedarienė, Gabija Biliute, Gabija Didziokaitė, Loreta Kavaliukaite, Agne Savonyte, Gabija Rudzikaite-Fergize, Roma Puronaite, Jolita Norkuniene, Regina Emuzyte, Ruta Dubakiene and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and translational allergy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.

Violeta KvedarienėDepartment of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Gabija BiliuteFaculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Gabija DidziokaitėFaculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9742-7179
Loreta KavaliukaiteFaculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Agne SavonyteFaculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Gabija Rudzikaite-FergizeFaculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Roma PuronaiteFaculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Jolita NorkunieneVilnius Gediminas Technical University, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Regina EmuzyteFaculty of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Clinic of Children's Diseases, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Ruta DubakieneVilnius University Medical Faculty, Institute of Clinical Medicine Clinics of Chest Diseases, Allergology and Immunology, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Arunas ValiulisInstitute of Clinical Medicine and Institute of Health Sciences, Medical Faculty of Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Bernardo Sousa-PintoMEDCIDS - Department of Community Medicine, Information and Health Decision Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Anna BedbrookARIA and MASK-Air, Montpellier, France.
Jean BousquetInstitute of Allergology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4061-4766
Vilnius University · LTAirbus (France) · FRHumboldt-Universität zu Berlin · DEUniversidade do Porto · PTVilnius Gediminas Technical University · LT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMASK-air

methodsIn a longitudinal study, Lithuanian adults with AR and/or asthma were recruited by allergists. They were informed about how to use MASK-air

resultsAmong the 149 patients recruited (37.2 ± 10.4 years), 52.4% had rhinitis alone, 42.9% had rhinitis, asthma and/or conjunctivitis multimorbidity, and 2.7% isolated asthma. According to the MASK-air DISCUSSION: When recommended by physicians, MASK-air® was used for a longer period of time.

Indexed as

asthmaLithuaniaMASK-airmHealthrhinitis

Identifiers

PMID36178186
PMCPMC9510653
OpenAlexW4297216129

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.