Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36178177›Full record

ArticlePaediatric anaesthesia2023

Consumer research priorities for pediatric anesthesia and perioperative medicine.

Aine Sommerfield, David Sommerfield, Emily Bell, Susan Humphreys, Fiona Taverner, Kenneth Lee, Belinda Frank, Britta Sylvia von Ungern-Sternberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Paediatric anaesthesia, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Aine SommerfieldDepartment of Anaesthesia and Pain Management, Perth Children's Hospital, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8418-5572
David SommerfieldDepartment of Anaesthesia and Pain Management, Perth Children's Hospital, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3600-1315
Emily BellPerioperative Medicine Team, Telethon Kids Institute, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia.
Susan HumphreysDepartment of Anaesthesia, Queensland Children's Hospital, South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0286-2088
Fiona TavernerDepartment of Paediatric Anaesthesia, Women's and Children's Hospital, North Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Kenneth LeeDiscipline of Pharmacy, School of Allied Health, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia.
Belinda FrankTelethon Kids Institute, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia.
Britta Sylvia von Ungern-SternbergDepartment of Anaesthesia and Pain Management, Perth Children's Hospital, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8043-8541

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundConsumer-driven research is increasingly being prioritized.

aimOur aim was to partner with consumers to identify the top 10 research priorities for pediatric anesthesia and perioperative medicine. The ACORN (Anesthesia Consumer Research Network) was formed to collaborate with children and families across Australia.

methodsA prospective online survey was developed to generate research ideas from consumers. The survey was developed in Qualtrics, a survey research platform. Consumers were invited to participate through poster advertising, social media posts, via consumer networks at participating hospitals and in addition 35 national consumer/patient representative organizations were approached. We also conducted a similar idea generating survey for clinicians through email invitation and via Twitter. A second round of surveys was conducted to prioritize the long list of research questions and a shortlist of priorities developed. A single consensus meeting was held, and a final consensus list of top 10 priorities emerged.

resultsA total of 281 research ideas were submitted between 356 consumers in the idea generating survey and from four consumer/patient representative groups. Seventy-five clinicians responded to the clinician idea generation survey. This was consolidated into 20 research ideas/themes for the second survey for each group. 566 responses were received to the consumer prioritization top 10 survey and 525 responses to the clinician survey. The consensus meeting produced the final 10 consumer research priorities.

conclusionThis study has given Australian consumers the opportunity to shape the anesthesia and perioperative medicine research agenda for pediatric patients both nationally and internationally.

Indexed as

AnesthesiaPerioperative MedicineAustraliaChildHumansProspective StudiesResearchSurveys and Questionnairesanesthesiaconsumerspediatricperioperative medicinePriority setting

Identifiers

PMID36178177
PMCPMC10092273

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.