Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36178163›Full record

ArticleBiology open2022

An alternative and effective method for extracting skeletal organic matrix adapted to the red coral Corallium rubrum.

Philippe Ganot, Guillaume Loentgen, Frédéric Marin, Laurent Plasseraud, Denis Allemand, Sylvie Tambutté

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Philippe GanotUnité de Recherche sur la Biologie des Coraux Précieux CSM - CHANEL, Centre Scientifique de Monaco, 8 Quai Antoine 1er, MC 98000 Monaco, Principality of Monaco.ORCID 0000-0003-1743-9709
Guillaume LoentgenUnité de Recherche sur la Biologie des Coraux Précieux CSM - CHANEL, Centre Scientifique de Monaco, 8 Quai Antoine 1er, MC 98000 Monaco, Principality of Monaco.
Frédéric MarinBiogéosciences, UMR CNRS-EPHE 6282, Université de Bourgogne - Franche-Comté, 6, Boulevard Gabriel, bâtiment Gabriel, 21000 DIJON, France.
Laurent PlasseraudICMUB Institut de Chimie Moléculaire de l'Université de Bourgogne, UMR CNRS 6302, Université de Bourgogne - Franche-Comté, 9, Avenue Alain Savary, bâtiment Mirande, 21000 DIJON, France.
Denis AllemandUnité de Recherche sur la Biologie des Coraux Précieux CSM - CHANEL, Centre Scientifique de Monaco, 8 Quai Antoine 1er, MC 98000 Monaco, Principality of Monaco.
Sylvie TambuttéUnité de Recherche sur la Biologie des Coraux Précieux CSM - CHANEL, Centre Scientifique de Monaco, 8 Quai Antoine 1er, MC 98000 Monaco, Principality of Monaco.

Funding

Centre Scientifique de MonacoInterface
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Skeleton formation in corals is a biologically controlled process in which an extracellular organic matrix (OM) is entrapped inside the calcified structure. The analysis of OM requires a time-consuming and tedious extraction that includes grinding, demineralization, multiple rinsing and concentration steps. Here we present an alternative and straightforward method for the red coral Corallium rubrum that requires little equipment and saves steps. The entire skeleton is directly demineralized to produce a tractable material called ghost, which is further rinsed and melted at 80°C in water. The comparative analysis of the standard and alternative methods by electrophoresis, western blot, and FTIR of C. rubrum OM, shows that the 'alternative OM' is of higher quality. Advantages and limitations of both methods are discussed.

Indexed as

AnthozoaAnimalsExtracellular MatrixWaterWaterBiomineralizationCalcificationOctocorals

Identifiers

PMID36178163
PMCPMC9581515

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.