Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36178052›Full record

ReviewDevelopment (Cambridge, England)2022

The emerging significance of splicing in vertebrate development.

Anouk M Olthof, Alisa K White, Rahul N Kanadia

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Development (Cambridge, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Integration of epigenetics into ecotoxicology: insights and fundamental research needs.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Alternative splicing in shaping the molecular landscape of the cochlea.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Anouk M OlthofPhysiology and Neurobiology Department, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269, USA.
Alisa K WhitePhysiology and Neurobiology Department, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269, USA.
Rahul N KanadiaPhysiology and Neurobiology Department, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7197-912X
University of Connecticut · USUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

Understanding the role of minor intron splicing in cortical developmentR01NS102538 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT STORRS · PI KANADIA, RAHUL N · 2018 to 2022
$1.8M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS102538
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Splicing is a crucial regulatory node of gene expression that has been leveraged to expand the proteome from a limited number of genes. Indeed, the vast increase in intron number that accompanied vertebrate emergence might have aided the evolution of developmental and organismal complexity. Here, we review how animal models for core spliceosome components have provided insights into the role of splicing in vertebrate development, with a specific focus on neuronal, neural crest and skeletal development. To this end, we also discuss relevant spliceosomopathies, which are developmental disorders linked to mutations in spliceosome subunits. Finally, we discuss potential mechanisms that could underlie the tissue-specific phenotypes often observed upon spliceosome inhibition and identify gaps in our knowledge that, we hope, will inspire further research.

Indexed as

ProteomeRNA SplicingAlternative SplicingAnimalsIntronsSpliceosomesVertebratesProteomeIntronsSpliceosomeSpliceosomopathiesSplicingTissue-specific phenotypesVertebrate development

Identifiers

PMID36178052
PMCPMC9641660
OpenAlexW4298088468

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.