ArticleOrthopaedic surgery2022
Cervical Spine Fracture Prediction by Simple Plain X-Ray in Ankylosing Spondylitis Patients after Low-Energy Trauma.
Article in Orthopaedic surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Management of cervical fractures in ankylosing spondylitis: a ten-year systemic review of surgical and nonsurgical outcomes.Neurosurgical review · 2025Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTimely diagnosis is essential in the management of cervical spine fracture (CSF) in ankylosing spondylitis (AS) patients. However, the value of simple plain X-ray in the early management of ASCSF has not been well-studied. This study aimed to explore the prediction ability of simple plain X-ray for CSF in AS patients who suffer from low-energy trauma (LET).
methodsFrom January 2010 to December 2020, AS patients who experienced LET were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical data including gender, age, body mass index, time interval between AS diagnosis and trauma, smoking or not, and a presence of continuous bony bridge between anterior margin of C1 and C2 body or not were collected. Morphological features including atlanto-occipital gap, Pavlov ratio of C2-7, Angle A-D, Borden's index, and Harrison's value were measured by the lateral cervical X-ray. All data was compared between patients who had CSF and those who did not. Binary logistic regression analysis and receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves were applied to discriminate and assess the predictive parameters.
resultsA total of 129 AS patients were divided into Fracture group (41 cases) and Non-fracture group (88 cases) based on whether CSF existed. Twelve parameters showed significant differences between two groups (p < 0.05). According to the binary logistic regression model, four of the 12 parameters showed a further correlation with the occurrence of CSF, namely, mean Pavlov ratio (p < 0.001, OR = 0.067, 95% CI: 0.023 to 0.194), Angle D (p = 0.031, OR = 1.057, 95% CI: 1.005 to 1.112), Borden's index (p = 0.042, OR = 1.131, 95% CI: 0.994 to 1.287), the time interval between the AS diagnosis and the trauma (p < 0.020, OR = 0.935, 95% CI: 0.883 to 0.990). The ROC curve further revealed the mean Pavlov ratio had the largest AUC (0.793) with the cut-off of 0.72. While the optimal cut-off value was 45.65° for Angle D (sensitivity = 61.0%, specificity = 78.4%), 9.79 for Borden's index (sensitivity = 87.8%, specificity = 37.5%), 15.50 years for the time interval between AS diagnosis and trauma (sensitivity = 70.7%, specificity = 56.8%).
conclusionsThe time interval between the AS diagnosis and the trauma, mean Pavlov ratio, Angle D, and Borden's index showed predictive ability for the occurrence of CSF in AS patients who encounter LET. Surgeons should consider measuring these parameters in the management of AS patient.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.