Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36178010›Full record

ArticleConservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology2022

Quantifying uncertainty about how interventions are assigned would improve impact evaluation in conservation: reply to Rasolofoson 2022.

Julia Patricia Gordon Jones, Megan Barnes, Johanna Eklund, Paul J Ferraro, Jonas Geldmann, Johan A Oldekop, Judith Schleicher

Abstract readComment
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Julia Patricia Gordon JonesSchool of Natural Sciences, College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Bangor University, Bangor, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5199-3335
Megan BarnesCentre for Environment and Economic Policy, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8300-0975
Johanna EklundDepartment of Geosciences and Geography, Faculty of Science, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-1263-8151
Paul J FerraroCarey Business School and Department of Environmental Health and Engineering, a joint department of the Bloomberg School of Public Health and the Whiting School of Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4777-5108
Jonas GeldmannCentre for Macroecology, Evolution and Climate, Globe Institute, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-1191-7610
Johan A OldekopGlobal Development Institute, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0565-812X
Judith SchleicherDepartment of Geography, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7817-4295

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesModels, StatisticalUncertaintycausal inferencecounterfactualhidden biasimpact evaluationstatistical matching

Identifiers

PMID36178010

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.