Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36177864›Full record

ArticleOrthopaedic surgery2022

Triangular Mechanical Structure of the Proximal Femur.

Gaoxiang Xu, Jiantao Li, Cheng Xu, Dou Xiong, Hua Li, Daofeng Wang, Wupeng Zhang, Hao Zhang, Licheng Zhang, Peifu Tang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Orthopaedic surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gaoxiang XuDepartment of Orthopaedics, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Jiantao LiDepartment of Orthopaedics, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Cheng XuDepartment of Orthopaedics, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Dou XiongDepartment of Orthopaedics, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Hua LiDepartment of Orthopaedics, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Daofeng WangDepartment of Orthopaedics, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Wupeng ZhangDepartment of Orthopaedics, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Hao ZhangDepartment of Orthopaedics, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Licheng ZhangDepartment of Orthopaedics, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6782-1749
Peifu TangDepartment of Orthopaedics, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4279-1704
Chinese PLA General Hospital · CN

Funding

Natural Science Foundation of Beijing Municipality 7222180the 13th Five-year Plan for Key Discipline Construction Project of PLA A350109
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe mechanical high modulus structure of the proximal femur could guide clinical surgical treatment and instrument design of proximal femoral fractures. The purpose of this study is to analyze and verify the mechanical structure of the proximal femur.

methodsA total of 375 patients with intertrochanteric fractures were imaged using computed tomography (CT) scans. Patients were grouped according to age and sex. Cortical and medullary cavity parameters (cortical thickness [CTh], cortical mean density [CM], upper-lower diameter length [ULL], and medial-lateral diameter length [MLL]) were measured at eight planes. Six proximal femoral finite element models of different sexes and ages were constructed. To verify the measurement results, Abaqus was used to implement the force load to describe the von Mises stress distribution, and the maximum von Mises stress values of each wall of the proximal femur were compared.

resultsThe CTh values of the lower and upper walls were higher than those of the anterior and posterior walls of the femoral neck (p < 0.05). The CM values of the lower and upper walls were higher than those of the anterior and posterior walls of the subcephalic and middle femoral neck (p < 0.05). The ULL value gradually increased from the subcephalic region to the bottom (p < 0.05). The CTh and CM values of the medial and lateral walls were higher than those of the anterior and posterior walls in the femoral trochanteric region (p < 0.05). The MLL value decreased gradually from the plane 20 mm above the upper edge to that 20 mm below the vertex of the femoral lesser trochanter (p < 0.05). The von Mises stress was concentrated on the upper and lower walls of the femoral neck and on the medial and lateral walls of the femoral trochanteric region. The maximum von Mises stress values of the upper and lower walls were higher than those of the anterior and posterior walls of the femoral neck. The maximum von Mises stress values of the medial and lateral walls were higher than those of the anterior and posterior walls in the femoral trochanteric region, except for the plane 20 mm above the upper edge of the femoral lesser trochanter.

conclusionThe bone mass of the proximal femur presented a triangular high-modulus distribution, which bore the main stress of the proximal femur. The triangular mechanical structure provides a guideline for the surgical strategy and instrument design of the proximal femur.

Indexed as

Femoral FracturesHip FracturesFemurFemur NeckHumansLower Extremityanatomic measurementcomputed tomographyfinite element analysisproximal femurtriangular mechanical structure

Identifiers

PMID36177864
PMCPMC9627078
OpenAlexW4298088512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.