Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36177853›Full record

ArticleNursing open2023

Paradoxical perception of humanistic care in the intensive care unit: A qualitative study.

Fateme Hasandoost, Eesa Mohammadi, Mojgan Khademi, Mahyar Seddighi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Voices from the ICU: Perspectives on Humanization in Critical Care Settings.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Fateme HasandoostFaculty of Medical Sciences, Nursing Department, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.ORCID 0000-0001-9483-0969
Eesa MohammadiFaculty of Medical Sciences, Nursing Department, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.ORCID 0000-0001-6169-9829
Mojgan KhademiSocial Determinants of Health Research Center, Lorestan University of Medical Sciences, Khoram-Abad, Iran.ORCID 0000-0001-7051-1605
Mahyar SeddighiAnesthesiology and critical care, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran.
Tarbiat Modares University · IRLorestan University of Medical Sciences · IRQazvin University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThe aim of this study was to explore the perceptions of nurses, patients and attendants of humanistic care in the intensive care unit.

designThe present study was a qualitative conventional content analysis conducted in the intensive care unit in a hospital in Iran, in 2019.

methodsData were collected using semi-structured interviews and field notes through purposive sampling with 17 nurses who worked in an adult ICU in a teaching hospital, 4 attendants and 4 alert patients, and then analysed using the Elo-Kyngäs method in 2008.

resultsAnalysis of the data led to the extraction of Four main themes as follows: (1) Insufficient understanding of nurses and patients' families of each other's roles, needs and expectations; (2) The use of personal and situational reasoning rather than ethical principles; (3) Caring stagnation; and (4) Satisfaction with care.

Indexed as

Intensive Care UnitsPatientsAdultHumansIranPerceptionQualitative Researchhumanistic careintensive care unitsnursingqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID36177853
PMCPMC9912452
OpenAlexW4298088392

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.