ArticleOrthopaedic surgery2022
Effect of Hip Joint Center on Multi-body Dynamics and Contact Mechanics of Hip Arthroplasty for Crowe IV Dysplasia.
Article in Orthopaedic surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of bone deformation on patient-specific finite element predictions of hip chondrolabral mechanics.Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials · 2026Article
- Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty for Osteoarthritis Secondary to Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip: A Retrospective Study with Minimum 12-Month Follow-Up.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2026Article
- Anatomical landmarks and intraoperative "safe zone" for precise acetabular prosthesis placement in total hip arthroplasty for developmental dysplasia of the hip.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2025Article
- Decrease in Global Offset Leads to Complaints of Worsening of Valgus Knee Deformity After Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients With Crowe Type IV Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip.Orthopaedic surgery · 2025Article
- Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients with Crowe III/IV Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip: Acetabular Morphology and Reconstruction Techniques.Orthopaedic surgery · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate the hip joint forces, Von Mises stress, contact pressure and micro-motion of hip prosthesis for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) patients under different hip joint centers using musculoskeletal (MSK) multi-body dynamics and finite element analysis.
methodsBoth MSK multi-body dynamics model and finite element (FE) model were based on CT data of a young female DDH patient with total hip replacement and were developed to study the biomechanics of the S-ROM hip prosthesis. The same offset of hip joint center along all six orientations compared with the standard position was set to predict its effects on both MSK multi-body dynamics and contact mechanics during one gait cycle.
resultsThe hip joint forces in the entire walking gait cycle showed two peak values and clear differences between them under different hip joint centers. The hip joint force increased when the hip joint center moved posteriorly (2101 N) and laterally (1969 N) to the anatomical center (1848 N) at the first peak by 13.7% and 6.6%, respectively. The hip joint force increased sharply when the hip center deviated laterally (2115 N) and anteriorly (2407 N), respectively, from the standard position (1742 N) at the second peak. For the sleeve of the S-ROM prosthesis, the maximum Von Mises stress and contact pressure of the sleeve increased if the hip joint center deviated from the anatomical center posteriorly at the first peak. However, the Von Mises stresses and contact pressure increased at anterior and lateral orientations, compared to that of the standard position at the second peak. Small changes were observed for the maximum relative sliding distance along most of the orientations at both peaks except in the lateral and medial orientations, in which an increase of 8.6% and a decrease of 13.6% were observed, respectively.
conclusionThe hip joint center obviously influenced the hip joint forces, stress, contact pressure and micro-motion of the hip implant for this female patient.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.