ReviewThe journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research2022
Biology and management of lobular endocervical glandular hyperplasia.
Review in The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical manifestations and ultrasonographic features of lobular endocervical glandular hyperplasia: a retrospective study of 135 patients.Annals of medicine · 2026Article
- Synchronous atypical lobular endocervical glandular hyperplasia of the cervix and endometrium: a clinicopathologic case report and review of literature.Journal of medical case reports · 2026Review
- Peutz-Jeghers syndrome with concurrent lobular endocervical glandular hyperplasia and sex cord tumor with annular tubules: a case report.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Lobular Endocervical Glandular Hyperplasia and Related Glandular Disorders: Current Status of Diagnosis with MR Imaging.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2025Review
- The Utility and Feasibility of Laparoscopic Surgery in Patients Diagnosed With Cervical Cystic Lesions.Cureus · 2024Article
- Diagnostic Utility of Hysteroscopic Biopsy in Cases of Suspected Lobular Endocervical Glandular Hyperplasia and Comparison with Cervical Conization.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Atypical lobular endocervical glandular hyperplasia: two case report and literature review.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- Lobular Endocervical Glandular Hyperplasia, a mimicker and potential pitfall for HPV-independent well differentiated Gastric-type Endocervical Adenocarcinoma: Case report and literature review focusing on histology, immunophenotype, and molecular findings.SAGE open medical case reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimLobular endocervical glandular hyperplasia (LEGH) is a multicystic proliferative disorder of the uterine cervix. The aim of this review was to clarify the current understanding of this unique tumor.
methodThis article reviews the chronological progress of research regarding clinico-pathological and genetic aspects of LEGH and related cervical cystic diseases such as Nabothian cyst and adenocarcinoma of gastric type (GAS), using the literature and data from our institute. We also describe clinical management including preoperative diagnosis and adequate surgical/expectant treatment based on the biological features.
resultsRecent studies revealed several unique aspects of LEGH, that is, (i) production of gastric mucin, (ii) symptomatic and histological similarity with minimal deviation adenocarcinoma (MDA), and (iii) frequent association with GAS, including MDA. These findings indicated that LEGH is a gastric metaplasia, as well as pre-cancerous neoplasia. For the preoperative diagnosis of LEGH, the combination of "cosmos" sign on magnetic resonance imaging, detection of gastric mucin, and lack of nuclear atypia on cytology is important. Cone biopsy is effective for pathological diagnosis. Simple hysterectomy is indicated as surgical treatment for LEGH; however, meticulous follow-up is also an option, especially for young patients, because the rate of malignant transformation was reported to be 1%-2%. For LEGH patients who selected follow-up, a worsening cytology and increase in lesion size were important signs of malignant change of LEGH for safe follow-up.
conclusionProper understanding of the characteristics of LEGH is important for adequate management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.