ArticleActa paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992)2023
Resuscitators' opinions on using a respiratory function monitor during neonatal resuscitation.
Article in Acta paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Respiratory Function Monitoring and Visual Attention in Resuscitating Term Infants: A Manikin-Based Randomised Crossover Trial.Acta paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992) · 2025Trial
- Barriers to adoption of respiratory function monitors in neonatal resuscitation.BMJ paediatrics open · 2026Article
- Quality of Bag-Mask Ventilation for Children Before Intubation: Single-Center PICU Pilot Observational Study, 2019-2022.Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies · 2026Observational
- Implementation of a brief training programme to reduce mask leak with a respiratory function monitor.BMJ paediatrics open · 2025Article
- Device Functionalities and Technology Acceptance for Innovations in Neonatal Ventilation and Enhanced, Immediate Newborn Care: International, Multicenter, Web-Based Survey Study.JMIR human factors · 2025Article
- Comparison of two respiratory function monitors for newborn mask ventilation: A randomised crossover study using simulation.Resuscitation plus · 2025Article
- Addressing the Humans in the Delivery Room-Optimising Neonatal Monitoring and Decision-Making in Transition.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Newborn face mask ventilation training using a standardised intervention and respiratory function monitor: a before and after manikin study.Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition · 2024Article
- Integration of a respiratory function monitor into newborn positive pressure ventilation training; development of a standardised training intervention.Resuscitation plus · 2024Article
- Introducing a novel respiratory function monitor for neonatal resuscitation training.Resuscitation plus · 2024Article
- The Respiratory Management of the Extreme Preterm in the Delivery Room.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Resuscitators' opinions on using a respiratory function monitor during neonatal resuscitation.Acta paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors at 8 institutions in 7 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimThe aim of this study was to assess the resuscitators' opinions of the usefulness and clinical value of using a respiratory function monitor (RFM) when resuscitating extremely preterm infants with positive pressure ventilation.
methodsThe link to an online survey was sent to 106 resuscitators from six countries who were involved in a multicentre trial that compared the percentage of inflations within a predefined target range with and without the RFM. The resuscitators were asked to assess the usefulness and clinical value of the RFM. The survey was online for 4 months after the trial ended in May 2019.
resultsThe survey was completed by 74 (70%) resuscitators of which 99% considered the RFM to be helpful during neonatal resuscitation and 92% indicated that it influenced their decision-making. The majority (76%) indicated that using the RFM improved their practice and made resuscitation more effective, even when the RFM was not available. Inadequate training was the key issue that limited the effectiveness of the RFM: 45% felt insufficiently trained, and 78% felt more training in using and interpreting the RFM would have been beneficial.
conclusionResuscitators considered the RFM to be helpful to guide neonatal resuscitation, but sufficient training was required to achieve the maximum benefit.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.